Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27277828›Full record

ArticleMolecular imaging and biology2016

Pre-clinical Evaluation of a Cyanine-Based SPECT Probe for Multimodal Tumor Necrosis Imaging.

Marieke A Stammes, Vicky T Knol-Blankevoort, Luis J Cruz, Hans R I J Feitsma, Laura Mezzanotte, Robert A Cordfunke, Riccardo Sinisi, Elena A Dubikovskaya, Azusa Maeda, Ralph S DaCosta and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular imaging and biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Necrosis binding of Ac-LysEJNMMI research · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The role of radionuclide probes for monitoring anti-tumor drugs efficacy: A brief review.Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie · 2017
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Marieke A StammesDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Vicky T Knol-BlankevoortDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Luis J CruzDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Hans R I J FeitsmaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Laura MezzanotteDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Robert A CordfunkeDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Riccardo SinisiInstitute of Chemical Sciences and Engineering (ISIC), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Elena A DubikovskayaInstitute of Chemical Sciences and Engineering (ISIC), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Azusa MaedaDivision of Biophysics and Bioimaging, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Ralph S DaCostaDivision of Biophysics and Bioimaging, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Katja BierauDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Alan ChanPercuros BV, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Eric L KaijzelDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Thomas J A SnoeksDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Ermond R van BeekDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Clemens W G M LöwikDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. c.lowik@erasmusmc.nl.
Leiden University Medical Center · NLÉcole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne · CHPercuros (Netherlands) · NLUniversity Health Network · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRecently we showed that a number of carboxylated near-infrared fluorescent (NIRF) cyanine dyes possess strong necrosis avid properties in vitro as well as in different mouse models of spontaneous and therapy-induced tumor necrosis, indicating their potential use for cancer diagnostic- and prognostic purposes. In the previous study, the detection of the cyanines was achieved by whole body optical imaging, a technique that, due to the limited penetration of near-infrared light, is not suitable for investigations deeper than 1 cm within the human body. Therefore, in order to facilitate clinical translation, the purpose of the present study was to generate a necrosis avid cyanine-based NIRF probe that could also be used for single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). For this, the necrosis avid NIRF cyanine HQ4 was radiolabeled with PROCEDURES: The necrosis avid properties of the radiotracer [

resultsUsing optical imaging and radioactivity measurements, in vitro, we showed selective accumulation of [

conclusionsThe radiotracer [

Indexed as

AnimalsCarbocyaninesCell Line, TumorDisease Models, AnimalFemaleHumansIndium RadioisotopesMice, Inbred BALB CMice, NudeMultimodal ImagingNecrosisNeoplasmsOptical ImagingPentetic AcidTissue DistributionTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonCarbocyaninesIndium RadioisotopesPentetic AcidCancerCyanineMultimodal imagingNecrosis avid contrast agentRadiolabeling

Identifiers

PMID27277828
PMCPMC5093207
OpenAlexW2418888716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.