Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27277806›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2016

Intracranial Recordings of Occipital Cortex Responses to Illusory Visual Events.

Maartje C de Jong, Ralph J M Hendriks, Mariska J Vansteensel, Mathijs Raemaekers, Frans A J Verstraten, Nick F Ramsey, Casper J Erkelens, Frans S S Leijten, Raymond van Ee

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Role of the Occipital Cortex in Resolving Perceptual Ambiguity.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Maartje C de JongDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, 3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands, dejongmc@gmail.com.
Ralph J M HendriksDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, 3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Mariska J VansteenselDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Mathijs RaemaekersDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Frans A J VerstratenThe University of Sydney, School of Psychology, New South Wales 2006 Sydney, Australia Department of Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, 3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5487-1755
Nick F RamseyDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Casper J ErkelensDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, 3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7234-1029
Frans S S LeijtenDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Raymond van EePhilips Research Laboratories, Department of Brain, Body & Behavior, 5656 AE Eindhoven, The Netherlands, Laboratory of Experimental Psychology, University of Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium, Donders Institute, Radboud University, Department of Biophysics, 6500 GL Nijmegen, The Netherlands, and.
University Medical Center Utrecht · NLUtrecht University · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLThe University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledAmbiguous visual stimuli elicit different perceptual interpretations over time, creating the illusion that a constant stimulus is changing. We investigate whether such spontaneous changes in visual perception involve occipital brain regions specialized for processing visual information, despite the absence of concomitant changes in stimulation. Spontaneous perceptual changes observed while viewing a binocular rivalry stimulus or an ambiguous structure-from-motion stimulus were compared with stimulus-induced perceptual changes that occurred in response to an actual stimulus change. Intracranial recordings from human occipital cortex revealed that spontaneous and stimulus-induced perceptual changes were both associated with an early transient increase in high-frequency power that was more spatially confined than a later transient decrease in low-frequency power. We suggest that the observed high-frequency and low-frequency modulations relate to initiation and maintenance of a percept, respectively. Our results are compatible with the idea that spontaneous changes in perception originate from competitive interactions within visual neural networks. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Ambiguous visual stimuli elicit different perceptual interpretations over time, creating the illusion that a constant stimulus is changing. The literature on the neural correlates of conscious visual perception remains inconclusive regarding the extent to which such spontaneous changes in perception involve sensory brain regions. In an attempt to bridge the gap between existing animal and human studies, we recorded from intracranial electrodes placed on the human occipital lobe. We compared two different kinds of ambiguous stimuli, binocular rivalry and the phenomenon of ambiguous structure-from-motion, enabling generalization of our findings across different stimuli. Our results indicate that spontaneous and stimulus-induced changes in perception (i.e., "illusory" and "real" changes in the stimulus, respectively) may involve sensory regions to a similar extent.

Indexed as

AdultBrain MappingDrug Resistant EpilepsyElectroencephalographyFemaleFunctional LateralityHumansIllusionsMaleMotionPhotic StimulationSpectrum AnalysisVision DisparityVisual CortexVisual Perceptionambiguousbinocular rivalryillusionintracranialoccipitalvisual

Identifiers

PMID27277806
PMCPMC6604888
OpenAlexW2411928644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.