ReviewCardiology and therapy2016
A Review of the Key Clinical Trials of 2015: Results and Implications.
Review in Cardiology and therapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in Clinical Cardiology 2022: A Summary of Key Clinical Trials.Advances in therapy · 2023Review
- Advances in Clinical Cardiology 2016: A Summary of the Key Clinical Trials.Advances in therapy · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMultiple significant, potentially practice changing clinical trials in cardiology have been conducted and subsequently presented throughout the past year.
methodsIn this paper, the authors have reviewed and contextualized significant cardiovascular clinical trials presented at major international conferences of 2015 including American College of Cardiology, European Association for Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions, American Diabetes Association, European Society of Cardiology, Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics, Heart Rhythm Congress, and the American Heart Association Scientific Sessions.
resultsThe authors describe new trial data for heart failure (including eplerenone, finerenone, patiromer, sacubitril/valsartan, the beta 3 agonist mirabegron, sitagliptin, empagliflozin, alginate-hydrogel LV epicardial implant), anticoagulation (idarucizumab and andexanet alfa reversal agents, adherence programmes, practice in ablation), transcatheter aortic valve replacement (long-term data, valve-in-valve use, the TriGuard embolic deflecting device), patent foramen ovale closure, cardiovascular prevention (PCSK9 inhibitors, hypertension treatment) and antiplatelets strategies (extended duration therapy with clopidogrel or ticagrelor). Trial data are also described for contemporary technologies including the Biofreedom polymer-free drug coated stent, bioabsorbable stents, PCI strategies, left main treatment, atrial fibrillation ablation techniques, leadless pacemakers and the role of coronary computed tomographic angiography.
conclusionsThis paper summarizes and contextualizes multiple pertinent 2015 clinical trials and will be of interest to both clinicians and cardiology researchers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.