Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27277556›Full record

ArticleDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2016

[Laparoscopic rectal resection technique].

M Anthuber, B Kriening, M Schrempf, B Geißler, B Märkl, S Rüth

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 93% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M AnthuberKlinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Klinikum Augsburg, Stenglinstr.2, 86156, Augsburg, Deutschland. anthuber@klinikum-augsburg.de.
B KrieningKlinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Klinikum Augsburg, Stenglinstr.2, 86156, Augsburg, Deutschland.
M SchrempfKlinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Klinikum Augsburg, Stenglinstr.2, 86156, Augsburg, Deutschland.
B GeißlerKlinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Klinikum Augsburg, Stenglinstr.2, 86156, Augsburg, Deutschland.
B MärklInstitut für Pathologie, Klinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Deutschland.
S RüthKlinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Klinikum Augsburg, Stenglinstr.2, 86156, Augsburg, Deutschland.
University Hospital Augsburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The quality of radical oncological operations for patients with rectal cancer determines the rate of local recurrence and long-term survival. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced tumors, a standardized surgical procedure for rectal tumors less than 12 cm from the anus with total mesorectal excision (TME) and preservation of the autonomous nerve system for sexual and bladder function have significantly improved the oncological results and quality of life of patients. The TME procedure for rectal resection has been performed laparoscopically in Germany for almost 20 years; however, no reliable data are available on the frequency of laparoscopic procedures in rectal cancer patients in Germany. The rate of minimally invasive procedures is estimated to be less than 20 %. A prerequisite for using the laparoscopic approach is implicit adherence to the described standards of open surgery. Available data from prospective randomized trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses indicate that in the early postoperative phase the generally well-known positive effects of the minimally invasive approach to the benefit of patients can be realized without any long-term negative impact on the oncological results; however, the results of many of these studies are difficult to interpret because it could not be confirmed whether the hospitals and surgeons involved had successfully completed the learning curve. In this article we would like to present our technique, which we have developed over the past 17 years in more than 1000 patients. Based on our experiences the laparoscopic approach can be highly recommended as a suitable alternative to the open procedure.

Indexed as

Chemoradiotherapy, AdjuvantCombined Modality TherapyConversion to Open SurgeryHumansLaparoscopyMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresPatient PositioningPostoperative ComplicationsQuality Assurance, Health CareRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRectal NeoplasmsConversion to open surgeryLaparoscopic surgeryMinimally invasive surgeryRectal cancerSurgical technique

Identifiers

PMID27277556
OpenAlexW2460310643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.