Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27277044›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2016

Semiautomated segmentation of head and neck cancers in 18F-FDG PET scans: A just-enough-interaction approach.

Reinhard R Beichel, Markus Van Tol, Ethan J Ulrich, Christian Bauer, Tangel Chang, Kristin A Plichta, Brian J Smith, John J Sunderland, Michael M Graham, Milan Sonka and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Diagnostic efficacy of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. One-stop evaluation using [Japanese journal of radiology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Comparison ofScientific reports · 2025
    Article
  17. Prediction of EGFR-TP53 genes co-mutations in patients with lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) byClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Reinhard R BeichelDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242; The Iowa Institute for Biomedical Imaging, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242; and Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242.
Markus Van TolDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242 and The Iowa Institute for Biomedical Imaging, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242.
Ethan J UlrichDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242 and The Iowa Institute for Biomedical Imaging, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242.
Christian BauerDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242 and The Iowa Institute for Biomedical Imaging, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242.
Tangel ChangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242.
Kristin A PlichtaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242.
Brian J SmithDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242.
John J SunderlandDepartment of Radiology, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242.
Michael M GrahamDepartment of Radiology, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242.
Milan SonkaDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242; Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242; and The Iowa Institute for Biomedical Imaging, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242.
John M BuattiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242 and The Iowa Institute for Biomedical Imaging, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242.

Funding

Viral VectorP30CA086862 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Douglas Robert Spitz · 2000 to 2026
$70.0M
Pulmonary Toxicology Facility CoreP30ES005605 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Brandi Janssen · 1990 to 2026
$40.5M
Graph-Based Medical Image Segmentation in 3D and 4DR01EB004640 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI BUATTI, JOHN M, SONKA, MILAN · 2006 to 2022
$6.1M
Quantitative Imaging to Assess Response in Cancer Therapy TrialsU01CA140206 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI BUATTI, JOHN M, CASAVANT, THOMAS L. · 2010 to 2019
$5.8M
Quantitative Image Informatics for Cancer Research (QIICR)U24CA180918 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI FEDOROV, ANDRIY, KIKINIS, RON · 2013 to 2017
$4.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA086862NCI NIH HHS U01 CA140206NCI NIH HHS U24 CA180918NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB004640NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES005605
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this work was to develop, validate, and compare a highly computer-aided method for the segmentation of hot lesions in head and neck 18F-FDG PET scans.

methodsA semiautomated segmentation method was developed, which transforms the segmentation problem into a graph-based optimization problem. For this purpose, a graph structure around a user-provided approximate lesion centerpoint is constructed and a suitable cost function is derived based on local image statistics. To handle frequently occurring situations that are ambiguous (e.g., lesions adjacent to each other versus lesion with inhomogeneous uptake), several segmentation modes are introduced that adapt the behavior of the base algorithm accordingly. In addition, the authors present approaches for the efficient interactive local and global refinement of initial segmentations that are based on the "just-enough-interaction" principle. For method validation, 60 PET/CT scans from 59 different subjects with 230 head and neck lesions were utilized. All patients had squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. A detailed comparison with the current clinically relevant standard manual segmentation approach was performed based on 2760 segmentations produced by three experts.

resultsSegmentation accuracy measured by the Dice coefficient of the proposed semiautomated and standard manual segmentation approach was 0.766 and 0.764, respectively. This difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.2145). However, the intra- and interoperator standard deviations were significantly lower for the semiautomated method. In addition, the proposed method was found to be significantly faster and resulted in significantly higher intra- and interoperator segmentation agreement when compared to the manual segmentation approach.

conclusionsLack of consistency in tumor definition is a critical barrier for radiation treatment targeting as well as for response assessment in clinical trials and in clinical oncology decision-making. The properties of the authors approach make it well suited for applications in image-guided radiation oncology, response assessment, or treatment outcome prediction.

Identifiers

PMID27277044
PMCPMC4874930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.