ArticleJournal of medical ultrasonics (2001)2013
Amlodipine has a preventive effect on temporal left ventricular hypokinesia after emotional stress compared with an angiotensin II receptor blocker.
Article in Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Takotsubo Syndrome: Translational Implications and Pathomechanisms.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWe previously reported that α- and β-blockers protected against emotional stress-induced cardiac dysfunction, but the protective effects of other antihypertensive drugs is unknown. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the ability of a calcium channel blocker, amlodipine, to prevent temporal left ventricular hypokinesia after emotional stress compared with an angiotensin II receptor blocker, olmesartan medoxomil.
methodsRats premedicated with amlodipine (0.2 mg/kg), olmesartan (0.8 mg/kg), or vehicle were restrained for 30 min (immobilization stress: IMO) to reproduce emotional stress and then anesthetized to release stress. We measured the fractional area change (FAC) using echocardiography (SONOS5500) with a s12 probe (frequency 5-12 MHz, frame rate 120 Hz) and blood pressure and heart rate at the end of IMO and every 10 for 60 min after IMO.
resultsDuring IMO, FAC in the amlodipine or the olmesartan group was as high as that in the vehicle group. At 20 min after IMO, FAC in the amlodipine group was significantly higher than in the other two groups (84 ± 8 vs. 60 ± 7 or 68 ± 15 %, p < 0.05). During IMO, blood pressure in the amlodipine or the olmesartan group was significantly lower than with vehicle (119 ± 6 and 110 ± 7 vs. 124 ± 5 mmHg, p < 0.05). After IMO, blood pressure in the olmesartan group was significantly lower than in the other two groups.
conclusionAcute administration of amlodipine could prevent a sudden drop in cardiac function after acute stress like IMO, but olmesartan did not. Amlodipine might have a protective effect on temporal left ventricular hypokinesia after emotional stress, which might not be related to decreased blood pressure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.