ReviewJournal of echocardiography2011
How should we measure global and regional left ventricular systolic function?
Review in Journal of echocardiography, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Delivery of progenitor cells with injectable shear-thinning hydrogel maintains geometry and normalizes strain to stabilize cardiac function after ischemia.The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2019Article
- Doxorubicin Cardiotoxicity and Cardiac Function Improvement After Stem Cell Therapy Diagnosed by Strain Echocardiography.Journal of cancer science & therapy · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The assessment of left ventricular (LV) systolic function is frequently the most important task during the echocardiography examination. LV ejection fraction (EF) is the most commonly used measure to assess LV systolic function. EF is well established, with strong prognostic and therapeutic implications, but, nevertheless, it may not always be satisfactory in all patients. Other measures of myocardial contractility can provide valuable additive information in some patients. This is particularly true in patients with suspected heart failure but normal EF. The measurement of longitudinal function using M-mode and/or deformation analysis from tissue Doppler data or speckle tracking algorithms can be useful in this respect. Regional LV dysfunction can be difficult to detect using visual semi-quantitative assessment of regional wall motion. Contrast echocardiography can be most helpful in delineating the LV endocardial border and, thus, increasing sensitivity for detecting wall motion abnormalities. Deformation analysis can also be helpful for detecting subtle wall motion abnormalities, but these methods should be used with caution due to measurement variability and image quality dependence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27276879What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.