Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27276395›Full record

ArticleClinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2016

Efficacy and safety of a NiTi CAR 27 compression ring for end-to-end anastomosis compared with conventional staplers: A real-world analysis in Chinese colorectal cancer patients.

Zhenhai Lu, Jianhong Peng, Cong Li, Fulong Wang, Wu Jiang, Wenhua Fan, Junzhong Lin, Xiaojun Wu, Desen Wan, Zhizhong Pan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The Colorectal Anastomosis: A Timeless Challenge.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2023
    Review
  4. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Colorectal Anastomotic Techniques.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Surgical complications in colorectal cancer patients.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zhenhai LuSun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Department of Colorectal Surgery, Guangzhou, P.R., China.
Jianhong PengSun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Department of Colorectal Surgery, Guangzhou, P.R., China.
Cong LiSun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Department of Colorectal Surgery, Guangzhou, P.R., China.
Fulong WangSun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Department of Colorectal Surgery, Guangzhou, P.R., China.
Wu JiangSun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Department of Colorectal Surgery, Guangzhou, P.R., China.
Wenhua FanSun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Department of Colorectal Surgery, Guangzhou, P.R., China.
Junzhong LinSun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Department of Colorectal Surgery, Guangzhou, P.R., China.
Xiaojun WuSun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Department of Colorectal Surgery, Guangzhou, P.R., China.
Desen WanSun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Department of Colorectal Surgery, Guangzhou, P.R., China.
Zhizhong PanSun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Department of Colorectal Surgery, Guangzhou, P.R., China.
Sun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a new nickel-titanium shape memory alloy compression anastomosis ring, NiTi CAR 27, in constructing an anastomosis for colorectal cancer resection compared with conventional staples.

methodsIn total, 234 consecutive patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer receiving sigmoidectomy and anterior resection for end-to-end anastomosis from May 2010 to June 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. The postoperative clinical parameters, postoperative complications and 3-year overall survival in 77 patients using a NiTi CAR 27 compression ring (CAR group) and 157 patients with conventional circular staplers (STA group) were compared.

resultsThere were no statistically significant differences between the patients in the two groups in terms of general demographics and tumor features. A clinically apparent anastomotic leak occurred in 2 patients (2.6%) in the CAR group and in 5 patients (3.2%) in the STA group (p=0.804). These eight patients received a temporary diverting ileostomy. One patient (1.3%) in the CAR group was diagnosed with anastomotic stricture through an electronic colonoscopy after 3 months postoperatively. The incidence of postoperative intestinal obstruction was comparable between the two groups (p=0.192). With a median follow-up duration of 39.6 months, the 3-year overall survival rate was 83.1% in the CAR group and 89.0% in the STA group (p=0.152).

conclusionsNiTi CAR 27 is safe and effective for colorectal end-to-end anastomosis. Its use is equivalent to that of the conventional circular staplers. This study suggests that NiTi CAR 27 may be a beneficial alternative in colorectal anastomosis in Chinese colorectal cancer patients.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAlloysAnastomosis, SurgicalAnastomotic LeakColon, SigmoidColorectal NeoplasmsEquipment DesignEquipment SafetyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative PeriodRetrospective StudiesAlloysnitinol

Identifiers

PMID27276395
PMCPMC4874270
OpenAlexW2410701827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.