Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27276393›Full record

ArticleClinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2016

The serum matrix metalloproteinase-9 level is an independent predictor of recurrence after ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation.

Gang Wu, Shun Wang, Mian Cheng, Bin Peng, Jingjun Liang, He Huang, Xuejun Jiang, Lizhi Zhang, Bo Yang, Yongmei Cha and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. The Role of Major Inflammatory Biomarkers in the Pathogenesis of Atrial Fibrillation.The Journal of innovations in cardiac rhythm management · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Atrial fibrosis underlying atrial fibrillation (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Gang WuRenmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Cardiovascular Research Institute of Wuhan University, Department of Cardiology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Shun WangRenmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Cardiovascular Research Institute of Wuhan University, Department of Cardiology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Mian ChengHuazhong University of Science and Technology, Tongji Medical College, Tongji Hospital, Department of Geriatrics, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Bin PengRenmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Cardiovascular Research Institute of Wuhan University, Department of Cardiology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Jingjun LiangRenmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Cardiovascular Research Institute of Wuhan University, Department of Cardiology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
He HuangRenmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Cardiovascular Research Institute of Wuhan University, Department of Cardiology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Xuejun JiangRenmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Cardiovascular Research Institute of Wuhan University, Department of Cardiology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Lizhi ZhangDivision of Anatomic Pathology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Bo YangRenmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Cardiovascular Research Institute of Wuhan University, Department of Cardiology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Yongmei ChaMayo Clinic, Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Rochester, MN, USA.
Hong JiangRenmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Cardiovascular Research Institute of Wuhan University, Department of Cardiology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Congxin HuangRenmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Cardiovascular Research Institute of Wuhan University, Department of Cardiology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · USHuazhong University of Science and Technology · CNTongji Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study investigated whether the serum matrix metalloproteinase-9 level is an independent predictor of recurrence after catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation.

methodsFifty-eight consecutive patients with persistent atrial fibrillation were enrolled and underwent catheter ablation. The serum matrix metalloproteinase-9 level was detected before ablation and its relationship with recurrent arrhythmia was analyzed at the end of the follow-up.

resultsAfter a mean follow-up of 12.1±7.2 months, 21 (36.2%) patients had a recurrence of their arrhythmia after catheter ablation. At baseline, the matrix metalloproteinase-9 level was higher in the patients with recurrence than in the non-recurrent group (305.77±88.90 vs 234.41±93.36 ng/ml, respectively, p=0.006). A multivariate analysis showed that the matrix metalloproteinase-9 level was an independent predictor of arrhythmia recurrence, as was a history of atrial fibrillation and the diameter of the left atrium.

conclusionThe serum matrix metalloproteinase-9 level is an independent predictor of recurrent arrhythmia after catheter ablation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.

Indexed as

AgedAtrial FibrillationCatheter AblationElectric CountershockFemaleHumansMaleMatrix Metalloproteinase 9Middle AgedMultivariate AnalysisPostoperative PeriodPredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesRecurrenceTime FactorsMatrix Metalloproteinase 9

Identifiers

PMID27276393
PMCPMC4874263
OpenAlexW2416958007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.