Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27276388›Full record

ArticleAJR. American journal of roentgenology2016

Is There a Role for PET/CT Parameters to Characterize Benign, Malignant, and Metastatic Parotid Tumors?

Ayse Tuba Karagulle Kendi, Kelly R Magliocca, Amanda Corey, James R Galt, Jeffrey Switchenko, J Trad Wadsworth, Mark W El-Deiry, David M Schuster, Nabil F Saba, Patricia A Hudgins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJR. American journal of roentgenology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Diagnostic and Prognostic Utility ofAJR. American journal of roentgenology · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ayse Tuba Karagulle Kendi1 Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, 1364 Clifton Rd NE, Atlanta, GA 30322.
Kelly R Magliocca2 Department of Pathology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Amanda Corey1 Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, 1364 Clifton Rd NE, Atlanta, GA 30322.
James R Galt1 Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, 1364 Clifton Rd NE, Atlanta, GA 30322.
Jeffrey Switchenko3 Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
J Trad Wadsworth4 Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Mark W El-Deiry4 Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
David M Schuster1 Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, 1364 Clifton Rd NE, Atlanta, GA 30322.
Nabil F Saba5 Department of Hematology Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Patricia A Hudgins1 Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, 1364 Clifton Rd NE, Atlanta, GA 30322.

Funding

Winship Cancer Institute Cancer Center Support GrantP30CA138292 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI MADHAV V DHODAPKAR · 2009 to 2026
$47.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA138292
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAssessment of benign and malignant lesions of the parotid gland, including metastatic lesions, is challenging with current imaging methods. Fluorine-18 FDG PET/CT is a noninvasive imaging modality that provides both anatomic and metabolic information. Semiquantitative data obtained from PET/CT, also known as PET/CT parameters, are maximum, mean, or peak standardized uptake values (SUVs); metabolic tumor volume; total lesion glycolysis; standardized added metabolic activity; and normalized standardized added metabolic activity. Our aim was to determine whether FDG PET/CT parameters can differentiate benign, malignant, and metastatic parotid tumors. MATERIALS AND

methodsThirty-four patients with parotid neoplasms underwent PET/CT before parotidectomy; maximum SUV, mean SUV, peak SUV, total lesion glycolysis, metabolic tumor volume, standardized added metabolic activity, and normalized standardized added metabolic activity were calculated on a dedicated workstation. Univariate analyses were performed. A ROC analysis was used to determine the ability of PET/CT parameters to predict pathologically proven benign, malignant, and metastatic parotid gland neoplasms.

resultsFourteen patients had a benign or malignant primary parotid tumor. Twenty had metastases to the parotid gland. When the specificity was set to at least 85% for each parameter to identify cut points, the corresponding sensitivities ranged from 15% to 40%. Assessment of benign versus malignant lesions of parotid tumors, as well as metastasis from squamous cell carcinoma versus other metastatic causes, revealed that none of the PET/CT parameters has enough power to differentiate among these groups.

conclusionPET/CT parameters, including total lesion glycolysis, metabolic tumor volume, standardized added metabolic activity, and normalized standardized added metabolic activity, are not able to differentiate benign from malignant parotid tumors, primary parotid tumors from metastasis, or metastasis from squamous cell carcinoma and nonsquamous cell carcinoma metastasis.

Indexed as

Positron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyAgedBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Squamous CellDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisParotid NeoplasmsRadiopharmaceuticalsRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityTumor BurdenBiomarkers, TumorFluorodeoxyglucose F18RadiopharmaceuticalsbenignFDGmalignantparameterparotidPET/CTtumor

Identifiers

PMID27276388
PMCPMC4993674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.