Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27276253›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2016

Three-Dimensional Domain Swapping Changes the Folding Mechanism of the Forkhead Domain of FoxP1.

Exequiel Medina, Cristóbal Córdova, Pablo Villalobos, Javiera Reyes, Elizabeth A Komives, César A Ramírez-Sarmiento, Jorge Babul

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Unveiling the dimer/monomer propensities of Smad MH1-DNA complexes.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Dissecting FOXP2 Oligomerization and DNA Binding.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Frontiers in physiology · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Exequiel MedinaDepartamento de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Cristóbal CórdovaDepartamento de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Pablo VillalobosDepartamento de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Javiera ReyesDepartamento de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Elizabeth A KomivesDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.
César A Ramírez-SarmientoDepartamento de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile. Electronic address: ceramirez@uchile.cl.
Jorge BabulDepartamento de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile. Electronic address: jbabul@u.uchile.cl.

Funding

Synapt G2-S System with HXMS AutomationS10OD016234 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI KOMIVES, ELIZABETH A. · 2013 to 2013
$600k
NIH HHS S10 OD016234
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The forkhead family of transcription factors (Fox) controls gene transcription during key processes such as regulation of metabolism, embryogenesis, and immunity. Structurally, Fox proteins feature a conserved DNA-binding domain known as forkhead. Interestingly, solved forkhead structures of members from the P subfamily (FoxP) show that they can oligomerize by three-dimensional domain swapping, whereby structural elements are exchanged between adjacent subunits, leading to an intertwined dimer. Recent evidence has largely stressed the biological relevance of domain swapping in FoxP, as several disease-causing mutations have been related to impairment of this process. Here, we explore the equilibrium folding and binding mechanism of the forkhead domain of wild-type FoxP1, and of two mutants that hinder DNA-binding (R53H) and domain swapping (A39P), using size-exclusion chromatography, circular dichroism, and hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry. Our results show that domain swapping of FoxP1 occurs at micromolar protein concentrations within hours of incubation and is energetically favored, in contrast to classical domain-swapping proteins. Also, DNA-binding mutations do not significantly affect domain swapping. Remarkably, equilibrium unfolding of dimeric FoxP1 follows a three-state N2 ↔ 2I ↔ 2U folding mechanism in which dimer dissociation into a monomeric intermediate precedes protein unfolding, in contrast to the typical two-state model described for most domain-swapping proteins, whereas the A39P mutant follows a two-state N ↔ U folding mechanism consistent with the second transition observed for dimeric FoxP1. Also, the free-energy change of the N ↔ U in A39P FoxP1 is ∼2 kcal⋅mol(-1) larger than the I ↔ U transition of both wild-type and R53H FoxP1. Finally, hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry reveals that the intermediate strongly resembles the native state. Our results suggest that domain swapping in FoxP1 is at least partially linked to monomer folding stability and follows an unusual three-state folding mechanism, which might proceed via transient structural changes rather than requiring complete protein unfolding as do most domain-swapping proteins.

Indexed as

Chromatography, GelCircular DichroismEscherichia coliForkhead Transcription FactorsHumansHydrodynamicsMass SpectrometryMutationProtein BindingProtein DomainsProtein FoldingProtein MultimerizationRepressor ProteinsThermodynamicsForkhead Transcription FactorsFOXP1 protein, humanRepressor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID27276253
PMCPMC4922571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.