Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27275948›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2016

Why Patients Delay Their First Contact with Health Services After Stroke? A Qualitative Focus Group-Based Study.

Alice Le Bonniec, Julie Haesebaert, Laurent Derex, Sylvie Porthault, Marie Préau, Anne-Marie Schott

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Delayed Stroke Treatment during COVID-19 Pandemic in China.Cerebrovascular diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Alice Le BonniecHospices Civils de Lyon, Pôle Information Médicale Evaluation Recherche, Lyon, France.
Julie HaesebaertHospices Civils de Lyon, Pôle Information Médicale Evaluation Recherche, Lyon, France.
Laurent DerexHospices Civils de Lyon, Unité de neurologie vasculaire, Hôpital Pierre Wertheimer, Lyon, France.
Sylvie PorthaultSAMU du Rhône, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69000, Lyon, France.
Marie PréauGroupe de Recherche en Psychologie Sociale (GRePS) EA4163, Université Lumière Lyon 2, Lyon, France.
Anne-Marie SchottHospices Civils de Lyon, Pôle Information Médicale Evaluation Recherche, Lyon, France.
Hospices Civils de Lyon · FRHealth Services and Performance Research Laboratory · FRHôpital Pierre Wertheimer · FRInserm · FRUniversité Lumière Lyon 2 · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite national and local French information campaigns, when acute stroke occurs, waiting times before calling mobile emergency medical services (EMS) to receive appropriate treatment (i.e. thrombolysis) and decrease the risk of physical disability, remain long. We aimed to identify the representations of stroke in the general population and to determine barriers to and facilitators for rapidly contacting EMS.

methodWe conducted a qualitative study among the general population with 10 focus groups, 5 comprising employed people (N = 29) and 5 comprising retirees (N = 32). The themes discussed were general knowledge about stroke and its risk factors, symptoms, appropriate management and the awareness that stroke is an emergency issue.

resultsIn addition to a lack of knowledge about stroke, other barriers to rapidly contacting the EMS were difficulties in recognizing symptoms and understanding that these symptoms constitute an emergency. Furthermore, when faced with stroke, a feeling of inevitability and fatalism about the consequences of a stroke was highlighted. Participants were unaware of the existence of an effective treatment and they mistrusted medical competences. Finally, we found a strong presence and participant appreciation of common knowledge, resulting in the sharing of experiences of stroke. This could partly compensate for the lack of specific knowledge about symptom recognition and appropriate action.

conclusionInformation campaigns should not only inform the public about stroke symptoms in order to ensure people act appropriately, but should also focus on increasing public awareness about the fact that an effective treatment exists.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthPatient Education as TopicAdultAgedEmergency Medical ServicesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsStroke

Identifiers

PMID27275948
PMCPMC4898830
OpenAlexW2418421107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.