Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27275510›Full record

ArticleGMS journal for medical education2016

Awareness of ethical issues in medical education: an interactive teach-the-teacher course.

Costanza Chiapponi, Konstantinos Dimitriadis, Gülümser Özgül, Robert G Siebeck, Matthias Siebeck

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GMS journal for medical education, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Ethical issues experienced by otolaryngologists: a conventional content analysis.Journal of medical ethics and history of medicine · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Explaining professionalism in moral reasoning: a qualitative study.Advances in medical education and practice · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Costanza ChiapponiHospital of the University of Magdeburg (OvGU), Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Magdeburg, Germany.
Konstantinos DimitriadisHospital of the University of Munich (LMU), Department of Neurology, Munich, Germany.
Gülümser ÖzgülHospital of Aalen, Department of Gynaecology, Aalen, Germany.
Robert G SiebeckMunich School of Philosophy, Munich, Germany.
Matthias SiebeckHospital of the University of Munich (LMU), Department of General, Visceral, Vascular and Transplantation Surgery, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe conducted an international, interdisciplinary teach-the-teacher course to sensitize physicians from different countries to ethical issues in medical education. The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of this course.

methodBefore and after participating in a short session on ethical issues in medical education, 97 physicians from different countries in Africa, Asia, and Europe completed a self-assessment questionnaire on their competence and interest in this field. The short session consisted of working in small groups to identify, analyze and discuss ethical dilemmas described in case vignettes adapted from published examples or written by medical students. In addition to the questionnaire, we conducted a large-group experience to explore four basic orientations of participants in ethical thinking: relativism, intentionalism, consequentialism, and absolutism.

resultsWe found a significant self-perceived increase in the participants' ability to identify and describe ethical issues and students' dilemmas, in their knowledge about these issues and teaching professionalism, and in their ability to describe both students' perspectives and teachers' and students' behaviors. In addition, participants' feeling of understanding their own culturally learned patterns of determining what is right and wrong increased after taking part in the course. The four contrasting basic ethical orientations showed no significant differences between participants regarding nationality, age, or gender.

conclusionEthics of education is an important issue for medical teachers. Teachers' self-perceived competence can be increased by working on case vignettes in small groups.

Indexed as

Education, MedicalEthics, MedicalAfricaAsiaEuropeHumansStudents, Medicalculturally learned patternsethicsmedical educationmoral decision-making

Identifiers

PMID27275510
PMCPMC4894361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.