Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27274816›Full record

ArticleClinical kidney journal2016

Feasibility of a hemodialysis safety checklist for nurses and patients: a quality improvement study.

Alison Thomas, Samuel A Silver, Andrea Rathe, Pamela Robinson, Ron Wald, Chaim M Bell, Ziv Harel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical kidney journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alison ThomasDivision of Nephrology , St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto , Toronto, ON , Canada.
Samuel A SilverDivision of Nephrology , St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto , Toronto, ON , Canada.
Andrea RatheDivision of Nephrology , St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto , Toronto, ON , Canada.
Pamela RobinsonDivision of Nephrology , St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto , Toronto, ON , Canada.
Ron WaldDivision of Nephrology, St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Medicine and Keenan Research Center, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Chaim M BellInstitute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Ziv HarelDivision of Nephrology, St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Medicine and Keenan Research Center, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
St. Michael's Hospital · CAUniversity of Toronto · CAMount Sinai Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with end-stage renal disease are at high risk for medical errors given their comorbidities, polypharmacy and coordination of care with other hospital departments. We previously developed a hemodialysis safety checklist (Hemo Pause) to be jointly completed by nurses and patients. Our objective was to determine the feasibility of using this checklist during every hemodialysis session for 3 months.

methodsWe conducted a single-center, prospective time series study. A convenience sample of 14 nurses and 22 prevalent in-center hemodialysis patients volunteered to participate. All participants were trained in the administration of the Hemo Pause checklist. The primary outcome was completion of the Hemo Pause checklist, which was assessed at weekly intervals. We also measured the acceptability of the Hemo Pause checklist using a local patient safety survey.

resultsThere were 799 hemodialysis treatments pre-intervention (13 January-5 April 2014) and 757 post-intervention (5 May-26 July 2014). The checklist was completed for 556 of the 757 (73%) treatments. Among the hemodialysis nurses, 93% (13/14) agreed that the checklist was easy to use and 79% (11/14) agreed it should be expanded to other patients. Among the hemodialysis patients, 73% (16/22) agreed that the checklist made them feel safer and should be expanded to other patients.

conclusionsThe Hemo Pause safety checklist was acceptable to both nurses and patients over 3 months. Our next step is to spread this checklist locally and conduct a mixed methods study to determine mechanisms by which its use may improve safety culture and reduce adverse events.

Indexed as

checklisthemodialysispatient safetyquality improvement

Identifiers

PMID27274816
PMCPMC4886914
OpenAlexW2339845633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.