Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27274607›Full record

ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering2012

Electrical detection of specific versus non-specific binding events in breast cancer cells.

Benjamin C King, Thomas Burkhead, Balaji Panchapakesan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Benjamin C KingSmall Systems Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292.
Thomas BurkheadSmall Systems Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292.
Balaji PanchapakesanSmall Systems Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292.
University of Louisville Hospital · USJames Graham Brown Foundation · USUniversity of Louisville · US

Funding

Nanotube Antibody Arrays for Profiling Circulating Diseased CellsR15CA156322 · NCI · WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE · PI PANCHAPAKESAN, BALAJI · 2011 to 2011
$463k
NCI NIH HHS R15 CA156322
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Detection of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) from patient blood samples offers a desirable alternative to invasive tissue biopsies for screening of malignant carcinomas. A rigorous CTC detection method must identify CTCs from millions of other formed elements in blood and distinguish them from healthy tissue cells also present in the blood. CTCs are known to overexpress certain surface receptors, many of which aid them in invading other tissue, and these provide an avenue for their detection. We have developed carbon nanotube (CNT) thin film devices to specifically detect these receptors in intact cells. The CNT sidewalls are functionalized with antibodies specific to Epithelial Cell Adhesion Molecule (EpCAM), a marker overexpressed by breast and other carcinomas. Specific binding of EpCAM to anti-EpCAM causes a change in the local charge environment of the CNT surface which produces a characteristic electrical signal. Two cell lines are tested in the device: MCF7, a mammary adenocarcinoma line which overexpresses EpCAM, and MCF10A, a non-tumorigenic mammary epithelial line which does not. Introduction of MCF7s causes significant changes in the electrical conductance of the devices due to specific binding and associated charge environment change near the CNT sidewalls. Introduction of MCF10A displays a different profile due to purely nonspecific interactions. The profile of specific vs. nonspecific interaction signatures using carbon based devices will guide development of this diagnostic tool towards clinical sample volumes.

Identifiers

PMID27274607
PMCPMC4890647
OpenAlexW2068029235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.