Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27274055›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2016

Ancient mtDNA sequences from the First Australians revisited.

Tim H Heupink, Sankar Subramanian, Joanne L Wright, Phillip Endicott, Michael Carrington Westaway, Leon Huynen, Walther Parson, Craig D Millar, Eske Willerslev, David M Lambert

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Humans, water, and the colonization of Australia.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 6 countries.

Tim H HeupinkEnvironmental Futures Research Institute, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD 4111, Australia;ORCID 0000-0001-6237-3898
Sankar SubramanianEnvironmental Futures Research Institute, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD 4111, Australia;
Joanne L WrightEnvironmental Futures Research Institute, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD 4111, Australia;
Phillip EndicottDepartment of Zoology, Oxford University, Oxford OX1 2JD, United Kingdom;
Michael Carrington WestawayEnvironmental Futures Research Institute, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD 4111, Australia;
Leon HuynenEnvironmental Futures Research Institute, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD 4111, Australia;
Walther ParsonInstitute of Legal Medicine, Innsbruck Medical University, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; Forensic Science Program, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16801;
Craig D MillarAllan Wilson Centre for Molecular Ecology and Evolution, School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand;
Eske WillerslevCentre for GeoGenetics, University of Copenhagen, 1017 Copenhagen, Denmark ewillerslev@snm.ku.dk d.lambert@griffith.edu.au.
David M LambertEnvironmental Futures Research Institute, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD 4111, Australia; ewillerslev@snm.ku.dk d.lambert@griffith.edu.au.
Griffith University · AUPennsylvania State University · USUniversity of Auckland · NZUniversity of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The publication in 2001 by Adcock et al. [Adcock GJ, et al. (2001) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98(2):537-542] in PNAS reported the recovery of short mtDNA sequences from ancient Australians, including the 42,000-y-old Mungo Man [Willandra Lakes Hominid (WLH3)]. This landmark study in human ancient DNA suggested that an early modern human mitochondrial lineage emerged in Asia and that the theory of modern human origins could no longer be considered solely through the lens of the "Out of Africa" model. To evaluate these claims, we used second generation DNA sequencing and capture methods as well as PCR-based and single-primer extension (SPEX) approaches to reexamine the same four Willandra Lakes and Kow Swamp 8 (KS8) remains studied in the work by Adcock et al. Two of the remains sampled contained no identifiable human DNA (WLH15 and WLH55), whereas the Mungo Man (WLH3) sample contained no Aboriginal Australian DNA. KS8 reveals human mitochondrial sequences that differ from the previously inferred sequence. Instead, we recover a total of five modern European contaminants from Mungo Man (WLH3). We show that the remaining sample (WLH4) contains ∼1.4% human DNA, from which we assembled two complete mitochondrial genomes. One of these was a previously unidentified Aboriginal Australian haplotype belonging to haplogroup S2 that we sequenced to a high coverage. The other was a contaminating modern European mitochondrial haplotype. Although none of the sequences that we recovered matched those reported by Adcock et al., except a contaminant, these findings show the feasibility of obtaining important information from ancient Aboriginal Australian remains.

Indexed as

AustraliaDNA, MitochondrialHumansLikelihood FunctionsPhylogenyDNA, MitochondrialAboriginal Australiansancient DNAanthropologybiological sciencesmitogenomics

Identifiers

PMID27274055
PMCPMC4922152
OpenAlexW2413772309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.