Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27273792›Full record

ArticleJAMA internal medicine2016

Intensive Treatment and Severe Hypoglycemia Among Adults With Type 2 Diabetes.

Rozalina G McCoy, Kasia J Lipska, Xiaoxi Yao, Joseph S Ross, Victor M Montori, Nilay D Shah

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA internal medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
15.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 139 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rozalina G McCoyDivision of Primary Care Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota2Division of Health Care Policy and Research, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota3Mayo Clinic Robert D. and Patricia.
Kasia J LipskaSection of Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Xiaoxi YaoDivision of Health Care Policy and Research, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota3Mayo Clinic Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Rochester, Minnesota.
Joseph S RossSection of General Medicine and Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Clinical Scholars Program, Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut6Department of Health Policy and Management, Yale University School of Public Healt.
Victor M MontoriDivision of Endocrinology Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota9Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Nilay D ShahDivision of Health Care Policy and Research, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota3Mayo Clinic Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Rochester, Minnesota10OptumLabs, Cambridge, M.
Mayo Clinic · USMayo Clinic in Florida · USYale University · US

Funding

Yale Study Support Suite (YES3): Dashboard and Web Portal Software Supporting Research Workflow through integrated, customizable REDCap External ModulesP30AG021342 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Denise Esserman · 2002 to 2026
$37.9M
Translating Information on Comparative Effectiveness into PracticeR18HS018339 · AHRQ · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI SHAH, NILAY D · 2009 to 2013
$1.9M
Predicting Severe Hypoglycemia among Older Adults with DiabetesK23AG048359 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI LIPSKA, KASIA JOANNA · 2014 to 2018
$778k
AHRQ HHS R18 HS018339NIA NIH HHS K23 AG048359NIA NIH HHS P30 AG021342
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceIntensive glucose-lowering treatment among patients with non-insulin-requiring type 2 diabetes may increase the risk of hypoglycemia.

objectivesTo estimate the prevalence of intensive treatment and the association between intensive treatment, clinical complexity, and incidence of severe hypoglycemia among adults with type 2 diabetes who are not using insulin. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsRetrospective analysis of administrative, pharmacy, and laboratory data from the OptumLabs Data Warehouse from January 1, 2001, through December 31, 2013. The study included nonpregnant adults 18 years or older with type 2 diabetes who achieved and maintained a hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level less than 7.0% without use of insulin and had no episodes of severe hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia in the prior 12 months. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Risk-adjusted probability of intensive treatment and incident severe hypoglycemia, stratified by patient clinical complexity. Intensive treatment was defined as use of more glucose-lowering medications than recommended by practice guidelines at specific index HbA1c levels. Severe hypoglycemia was ascertained by ambulatory, emergency department, and hospital claims for hypoglycemia during the 2 years after the index HbA1c test. Patients were categorized as having high vs low clinical complexity if they were 75 years or older, had dementia or end-stage renal disease, or had 3 or more serious chronic conditions.

resultsOf 31 542 eligible patients (median age, 58 years; interquartile range, 51-65 years; 15 483 women [49.1%]; 18 188 white [57.7%]), 3910 (12.4%) had clinical complexity. The risk-adjusted probability of intensive treatment was 25.7% (95% CI, 25.1%-26.2%) in patients with low clinical complexity and 20.8% (95% CI, 19.4%-22.2%) in patients with high clinical complexity. In patients with low clinical complexity, the risk-adjusted probability of severe hypoglycemia during the subsequent 2 years was 1.02% (95% CI, 0.87%-1.17%) with standard treatment and 1.30% (95% CI, 0.98%-1.62%) with intensive treatment (absolute difference, 0.28%; 95% CI, -0.10% to 0.66%). In patients with high clinical complexity, intensive treatment significantly increased the risk-adjusted probability of severe hypoglycemia from 1.74% (95% CI, 1.28%-2.20%) with standard treatment to 3.04% (95% CI, 1.91%-4.18%) with intensive treatment (absolute difference, 1.30%; 95% CI, 0.10%-2.50%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: More than 20% of patients with type 2 diabetes received intensive treatment that may be unnecessary. Among patients with high clinical complexity, intensive treatment nearly doubles the risk of severe hypoglycemia.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsHypoglycemiaHypoglycemic AgentsComorbidityDrug MonitoringFemaleGlycated HemoglobinHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeeds AssessmentPatient Care ManagementPrevalenceRetrospective StudiesRisk AdjustmentGlycated HemoglobinHypoglycemic Agents

Identifiers

PMID27273792
PMCPMC5380118
OpenAlexW2413896585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.