Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27273323›Full record

ArticleHeredity2016

A longitudinal genetic survey identifies temporal shifts in the population structure of Dutch house sparrows.

L Cousseau, M Husemann, R Foppen, C Vangestel, L Lens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heredity, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

L CousseauTerrestrial Ecology Unit, Department of Biology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-9719-0434
M HusemannGeneral Zoology, Martin-Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5536-6681
R FoppenSovon, Dutch Centre for Field Ornithology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
C VangestelTerrestrial Ecology Unit, Department of Biology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
L LensTerrestrial Ecology Unit, Department of Biology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dutch house sparrow (Passer domesticus) densities dropped by nearly 50% since the early 1980s, and similar collapses in population sizes have been reported across Europe. Whether, and to what extent, such relatively recent demographic changes are accompanied by concomitant shifts in the genetic population structure of this species needs further investigation. Therefore, we here explore temporal shifts in genetic diversity, genetic structure and effective sizes of seven Dutch house sparrow populations. To allow the most powerful statistical inference, historical populations were resampled at identical locations and each individual bird was genotyped using nine polymorphic microsatellites. Although the demographic history was not reflected by a reduction in genetic diversity, levels of genetic differentiation increased over time, and the original, panmictic population (inferred from the museum samples) diverged into two distinct genetic clusters. Reductions in census size were supported by a substantial reduction in effective population size, although to a smaller extent. As most studies of contemporary house sparrow populations have been unable to identify genetic signatures of recent population declines, results of this study underpin the importance of longitudinal genetic surveys to unravel cryptic genetic patterns.

Indexed as

Genetic DriftGenetic VariationAnimalsGene FlowGene FrequencyGenetics, PopulationGenotypeLinkage DisequilibriumMicrosatellite RepeatsModels, GeneticModels, StatisticalNetherlandsPopulation DensitySequence Analysis, DNASparrowsSpatial Analysis

Identifiers

PMID27273323
PMCPMC5026754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.