Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27273131›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2016

Sensitivity of BRCA1/2 testing in high-risk breast/ovarian/male breast cancer families: little contribution of comprehensive RNA/NGS panel testing.

Helen Byers, Yvonne Wallis, Elke M van Veen, Fiona Lalloo, Kim Reay, Philip Smith, Andrew J Wallace, Naomi Bowers, William G Newman, D Gareth Evans

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. GermlineJournal of personalized medicine · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. FromBreast care (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Helen ByersGenomic Medicine, Institute of Human Development, St. Mary's Hospital, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Central Manchester Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Yvonne WallisWest Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Elke M van VeenGenomic Medicine, Institute of Human Development, St. Mary's Hospital, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Central Manchester Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Fiona LallooGenomic Medicine, Institute of Human Development, St. Mary's Hospital, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Central Manchester Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Kim ReayWest Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Philip SmithGenomic Medicine, Institute of Human Development, St. Mary's Hospital, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Central Manchester Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Andrew J WallaceGenomic Medicine, Institute of Human Development, St. Mary's Hospital, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Central Manchester Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Naomi BowersGenomic Medicine, Institute of Human Development, St. Mary's Hospital, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Central Manchester Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
William G NewmanGenomic Medicine, Institute of Human Development, St. Mary's Hospital, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Central Manchester Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
D Gareth EvansGenomic Medicine, Institute of Human Development, St. Mary's Hospital, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Central Manchester Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
St. Mary’s Hospital · ZACancer Research UK Manchester Institute · GBRadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The sensitivity of testing BRCA1 and BRCA2 remains unresolved as the frequency of deep intronic splicing variants has not been defined in high-risk familial breast/ovarian cancer families. This variant category is reported at significant frequency in other tumour predisposition genes, including NF1 and MSH2. We carried out comprehensive whole gene RNA analysis on 45 high-risk breast/ovary and male breast cancer families with no identified pathogenic variant on exonic sequencing and copy number analysis of BRCA1/2. In addition, we undertook variant screening of a 10-gene high/moderate risk breast/ovarian cancer panel by next-generation sequencing. DNA testing identified the causative variant in 50/56 (89%) breast/ovarian/male breast cancer families with Manchester scores of ≥50 with two variants being confirmed to affect splicing on RNA analysis. RNA sequencing of BRCA1/BRCA2 on 45 individuals from high-risk families identified no deep intronic variants and did not suggest loss of RNA expression as a cause of lost sensitivity. Panel testing in 42 samples identified a known RAD51D variant, a high-risk ATM variant in another breast ovary family and a truncating CHEK2 mutation. Current exonic sequencing and copy number analysis variant detection methods of BRCA1/2 have high sensitivity in high-risk breast/ovarian cancer families. Sequence analysis of RNA does not identify any variants undetected by current analysis of BRCA1/2. However, RNA analysis clarified the pathogenicity of variants of unknown significance detected by current methods. The low diagnostic uplift achieved through sequence analysis of the other known breast/ovarian cancer susceptibility genes indicates that further high-risk genes remain to be identified.

Indexed as

PedigreeRNA SplicingAdultAgedAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinBreast Neoplasms, MaleCheckpoint Kinase 2FemaleGenetic TestingHumansIntronsMaleMiddle AgedOvarian NeoplasmsAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsATM protein, humanBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, humanCheckpoint Kinase 2CHEK2 protein, humanRAD51 protein, humanRad51 Recombinase

Identifiers

PMID27273131
PMCPMC5110056
OpenAlexW2412268564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.