Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27273045›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Clinical oncology2016

The role of Internet resources in clinical oncology: promises and challenges.

Bradford W Hesse, Alexandra J Greenberg, Lila J Finney Rutten

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Clinical oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of online supportive care for individuals living with and beyond lung cancer: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Investigation of the Readability and Reliability of Online Health Information for Cancer Patients During the Coronavirus Pandemic.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Bladder Cancer and Google Trends: Associations Between US Search Patterns and Disease Outcomes May Show Need for Improved Awareness Strategies.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2021
    Article
  15. Internet and social media use in cancer patients: association with distress and perceived benefits and limitations.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
  16. Assessment of Online Resources for Returning to School During and After Treatment of Childhood Cancer.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Nutrition Education Services Described on National Cancer Institute (NCI)-Designated Cancer Center Websites.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bradford W HesseHealth Communication and Informatics Research Branch (HCIRB), Behavioral Research Program (BRP), National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.
Alexandra J GreenbergHealth Communication and Informatics Research Branch (HCIRB), Behavioral Research Program (BRP), National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.
Lila J Finney RuttenRobert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Internet is a valuable tool that continues to revolutionize many aspects of our lives; however, the ability to disseminate diverse data across populations and nations presents both opportunities and challenges. Online resources are increasingly used in health care, providing wider access to information for patients, researchers, and clinicians. At the turn of the millennium, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) predicted that Internet-based technologies would create a revolution in communication for oncology professionals and patients with cancer. Herein, findings from the NCI's Health Information National Trends Survey are reviewed to give insight into how Internet trends related to oncology patients are evolving. Future trends are discussed, including examples of 'connected health' in oncology; the spread of mobile and ubiquitous access points to Internet-hosted information; the diffusion of devices, sensors, and apps; the spread of personal data sharing; and an evolution in how networks can support person-centred and family-centred care.

Indexed as

Medical OncologyAdolescentAdultAgedFamily HealthForecastingHealth Information SystemsHealth Services AccessibilityHumansInformation DisseminationInformation ServicesInternetMiddle AgedMobile ApplicationsNeoplasmsYoung Adult

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.