ArticlePediatric cardiology2016
Is Endomyocardial Biopsy a Safe and Useful Procedure in Children with Suspected Cardiomyopathy?
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Major Adverse Events of Cardiac Catheterization in Pediatric Cardiomyopathy: Insights From the IMPACT Registry.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- "Bridging the clinical, molecular and genetic perspectives on myocarditis in post-COVID-19 era".International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2026Review
- Advancements and challenges in pediatric dilated cardiomyopathy: a comprehensive review of current approaches and future directions.European journal of pediatrics · 2025Review
- New-onset heart failure in infants: when the aetiological diagnosis becomes a challenge.European journal of pediatrics · 2024Article
- Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance/European Society of Cardiovascular Imaging/American Society of Echocardiography/Society for Pediatric Radiology/North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging Guidelines for the use of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in pediatric congenital and acquired heart disease : Endorsed by The American Heart Association.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2022Review
- Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance/European Society of Cardiovascular Imaging/American Society of Echocardiography/Society for Pediatric Radiology/North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging Guidelines for the Use of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Pediatric Congenital and Acquired Heart Disease: Endorsed by The American Heart Association.Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging · 2022Review
- Pediatric Myocarditis: What Have We Learnt So Far?Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2022Review
- Parvovirus B19 myocarditis in children: a diagnostic and therapeutic approach.European journal of pediatrics · 2022Article
- Endomyocardial Biopsy in Pediatric Myocarditis and Dilated Cardiomyopathy: A Tool in Search for a Role.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2022Review
- Myocarditis in Paediatric Patients: Unveiling the Progression to Dilated Cardiomyopathy and Heart Failure.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) is a common procedure used to aid in the diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of suspected pediatric cardiomyopathy. In suspected cardiomyopathy, no multicenter experience has previously reported on the safety and utility of EMBs. Retrospectively, adverse event (AE) and patient and procedural characteristics were obtained at seven institutions participating in the Congenital Cardiac Catheterization Outcomes Project for both a cardiomyopathy (n = 158) and a post-transplant surveillance (n = 2665) cohort. Descriptive information regarding biopsy indication, pathology and clinical management based on EMB findings were retrospectively obtained. High-severity AEs were more common in the cardiomyopathy cohort when compared to the post-transplant surveillance cohort. The cardiomyopathy cohort was younger, more hemodynamically vulnerable and required more cardiorespiratory support during the procedure. The eight high-severity AEs in the cardiomyopathy group included one myocardial perforation, two ECMO cannulations and three deaths following the EMB. Factors associated with high-severity AEs included performing another catheter-based intervention during the EMB and longer fluoroscopy time. Notably, an increased number of biopsy attempts did not increase the risk of an AE. Suspected myocarditis was the most common indication. Diagnostic EMB pathology and thus alteration to clinical management based on pathology occurred more frequently in patients with suspected myocarditis. In conclusion, there is an increased incidence of high-severity AEs in patients undergoing EMB for suspected cardiomyopathy. EMB may be more clinically useful in the management of suspected myocarditis. The increased risk of high-severity AEs when additional interventions are performed highlights the hemodynamic vulnerability in patients with suspected cardiomyopathy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.