Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27272661›Full record

Trial reportStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2016

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy of rectal carcinoma : Baseline hematologic parameters influencing outcomes.

Miroslav Hodek, Igor Sirák, Alexander Ferko, Július Örhalmi, Eva Hovorková, Dimitar Hadži Nikolov, Petr Paluska, Jindřich Kopecký, Jiří Petera, Milan Vošmik

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Miroslav HodekDepartment of Oncology and Radiotherapy, University Hospital in Hradec Králové, Sokolská 581, 500 05, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic. miroslav.hodek@fnhk.cz.
Igor SirákDepartment of Oncology and Radiotherapy, University Hospital in Hradec Králové, Sokolská 581, 500 05, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
Alexander FerkoDepartment of Surgery, University Hospital in Hradec Králové, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
Július ÖrhalmiDepartment of Surgery, University Hospital in Hradec Králové, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
Eva HovorkováFingerland Department of Pathology, University Hospital in Hradec Králové, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
Dimitar Hadži NikolovFingerland Department of Pathology, University Hospital in Hradec Králové, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
Petr PaluskaDepartment of Oncology and Radiotherapy, University Hospital in Hradec Králové, Sokolská 581, 500 05, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
Jindřich KopeckýDepartment of Oncology and Radiotherapy, University Hospital in Hradec Králové, Sokolská 581, 500 05, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
Jiří PeteraDepartment of Oncology and Radiotherapy, University Hospital in Hradec Králové, Sokolská 581, 500 05, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
Milan VošmikDepartment of Oncology and Radiotherapy, University Hospital in Hradec Králové, Sokolská 581, 500 05, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe link between the blood count and a systemic inflammatory response (SIR) is indisputable and well described. Pretreatment hematological parameters may predict the overall clinical outcomes in many types of cancer. Thus, this study aims to systematically evaluate the relationship between baseline blood count levels and treatment response in rectal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. PATIENTS AND

methodsFrom 2009-2015, 173 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer were retrospectively enrolled in the study and analyzed. The baseline blood count was recorded in all patients 1 week before chemoradiation. Tumor response was evaluated through pathologic findings. Blood count levels which included RBC (red blood cells), Hb (hemoglobin), PLT (platelet count), neutrophil count, WBC (white blood cells), NLR (neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio), and PLR (platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio) were analyzed in relation to tumor downstaging, pCR (pathologic complete response), OS (overall survival), and DFS (disease-free survival).

resultsHb levels were associated with a response in logistic regression analysis: pCR (p = 0.05; OR 1.04, 95 % CI 1.00-1.07); T downstaging (p = 0.006; OR 1.03, 95 % CI 1.01-1.05); N downstaging (p = 0.09; OR 1.02, 95 % CI 1.00-1.04); T or N downstaging (p = 0.007; OR 1.04, 95 % CI 1.01-1.07); T and N downstaging (p = 0.02; OR 1.02, 95 % CI 1.00-1.04); Hb and RBC were the most significant parameters influencing OS; PLT was a negative prognostic factor for OS and DFS (p = 0.008 for OS); an NLR value of 2.8 was associated with the greatest significance for OS (p = 0.03) and primary tumor downstaging (p = 0.02).

conclusionKnowledge of pretreatment hematological parameters appears to be an important prognostic factor in patients with rectal carcinoma.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBlood Cell CountChemoradiotherapy, AdjuvantCzech RepublicDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CarePrevalencePrognosisRectal NeoplasmsReproducibility of ResultsBlood plateletsHemoglobin levelNeoadjuvant TreatmentNeutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratioTumor regression

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.