Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27272660›Full record

Trial reportStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2016

Risk of biochemical recurrence and timing of radiotherapy in pT3a N0 prostate cancer with positive surgical margin : A single center experience.

Nina-Sophie Hegemann, Sebastian Morcinek, Alexander Buchner, Alexander Karl, Christian Stief, Ruth Knüchel, Stefanie Corradini, Minglun Li, Claus Belka, Ute Ganswindt

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Salvage radiotherapy for macroscopic local recurrences after radical prostatectomy : A national survey on patterns of practice.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nina-Sophie HegemannDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Sebastian MorcinekDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Alexander BuchnerDepartment of Urology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
Alexander KarlDepartment of Urology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
Christian StiefDepartment of Urology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
Ruth KnüchelDepartment of Pathology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Stefanie CorradiniDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Minglun LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Claus BelkaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Ute GanswindtDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany. ute.ganswindt@med.uni-muenchen.de.
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DERWTH Aachen University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite improved biochemical recurrence-free survival rates by the use of immediate adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer, disagreement about the need and timing of RT remains. PATIENTS AND

methodsFrom 2005-2009, 94 patients presenting with a stage pT3a N0 and microscopic positive resection margin were retrospectively analyzed after radical prostatectomy. Special attention was given to patients' outcome, the frequency of additive RT, and its efficacy.

resultsMedian follow-up was 80 months. A total of 71 patients had a negative postoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level (<0.07 ng/ml). Thirty-six of them did not experience any PSA relapse (subgroup 1). Fourteen of them received additive RT and during follow-up all 36 patients remained PSA negative. Of 71 initially PSA-negative patients, 35 had a biochemical relapse (subgroup 2); 28 patients underwent salvage RT. The median PSA value before salvage RT was 0.24 ng/ml and was subsequently negative (<0.07 ng/ml) in 23 patients after RT. Of the entire cohort, 23 patients had persisting PSA after surgery (subgroup 3). Of these, 18 patients received salvage RT at a median PSA level of 0.4 ng/ml. One patient in subgroup 1, 5 patients in subgroup 2, and 9 patients in subgroup 3 had ongoing androgen deprivation therapy.

conclusionThe present study of 94 pT3a N0 R1 prostate cancer patients provides insight into medical care of this patient cohort and underlines the need for additive RT for the majority of patients to achieve long-term biochemical control. Although immediate adjuvant RT was applied with restraint (20 %), during the observation period 60 of 94 patients (63.8 %) received RT - highlighting the need of postoperative treatment.

Indexed as

Margins of ExcisionAgedBiomarkers, TumorHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingProstatectomyProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsRadiotherapy, AdjuvantRadiotherapy, ConformalTime-to-TreatmentTreatment OutcomeBiomarkers, TumorProstate-Specific AntigenBiochemical relapsePostoperative radiotherapyProstate cancerRadical prostatectomySalvage radiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID27272660
OpenAlexW2505998381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.