Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27272551›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Discrimination of human faces by archerfish (Toxotes chatareus).

Cait Newport, Guy Wallis, Yarema Reshitnyk, Ulrike E Siebeck

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The visual challenges of short-range navigation in teleost fish.The Journal of experimental biology · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Cleaner fish recognize self in a mirror via self-face recognition like humans.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Recognition of natural objects in the archerfish.The Journal of experimental biology · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Automated Operant Conditioning Devices for Fish. Do They Work?Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Long-range neural inhibition and stimulus competition in the archerfish optic tectum.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cait NewportSchool of Biomedical Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Guy WallisCentre for Sensorimotor Performance, School of Human Movement Studies, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Yarema ReshitnykARC Centre of Excellence for Engineered Quantum Systems, School of Mathematics and Physics, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Ulrike E SiebeckSchool of Biomedical Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two rival theories of how humans recognize faces exist: (i) recognition is innate, relying on specialized neocortical circuitry, and (ii) recognition is a learned expertise, relying on general object recognition pathways. Here, we explore whether animals without a neocortex, can learn to recognize human faces. Human facial recognition has previously been demonstrated for birds, however they are now known to possess neocortex-like structures. Also, with much of the work done in domesticated pigeons, one cannot rule out the possibility that they have developed adaptations for human face recognition. Fish do not appear to possess neocortex-like cells, and given their lack of direct exposure to humans, are unlikely to have evolved any specialized capabilities for human facial recognition. Using a two-alternative forced-choice procedure, we show that archerfish (Toxotes chatareus) can learn to discriminate a large number of human face images (Experiment 1, 44 faces), even after controlling for colour, head-shape and brightness (Experiment 2, 18 faces). This study not only demonstrates that archerfish have impressive pattern discrimination abilities, but also provides evidence that a vertebrate lacking a neocortex and without an evolutionary prerogative to discriminate human faces, can nonetheless do so to a high degree of accuracy.

Indexed as

AnimalsAvoidance LearningChoice BehaviorConditioning, ClassicalDiscrimination LearningDiscrimination, PsychologicalFaceFemaleHumansMalePattern Recognition, VisualPerciformes

Identifiers

PMID27272551
PMCPMC4895153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.