Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27272518›Full record

Trial reportLasers in medical science2016

Effect of pre-exercise phototherapy applied with different cluster probe sizes on elbow flexor muscle fatigue.

Mateus Rossato, Rodolfo A Dellagrana, Fábio J Lanferdini, Raphael L Sakugawa, Caetano D Lazzari, Bruno M Baroni, Fernando Diefenthaeler

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Lasers in medical science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. The Influence of Phototherapy on Recovery From Exercise-Induced Muscle Damage.International journal of sports physical therapy · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Mateus RossatoBiomechanics Laboratory, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.
Rodolfo A DellagranaBiomechanics Laboratory, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.
Fábio J LanferdiniExercise Research Laboratory, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Raphael L SakugawaBiomechanics Laboratory, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.
Caetano D LazzariBiomechanics Laboratory, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.
Bruno M BaroniFederal University of Health Sciences of Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Fernando DiefenthaelerBiomechanics Laboratory, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil. fernando.diefenthaeler@ufsc.br.
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina · BRUniversidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre · BRUniversidade Federal do Amazonas · BRUniversidade Regional Integrada do Alto Uruguai e das Missões · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phototherapy has been used for reducing muscle fatigue. In view of the various types of phototherapy cluster probes available in the market, the purpose of this study was to compare the effects of a similar phototherapy dosage with two different cluster probes on elbow flexor muscle fatigue: small cluster probe (SC = 9 diodes; 7.5 cm(2)) vs. large cluster probe (LC = 33 diodes; 30.2 cm(2)). Ten physically active male aged 18-35 years participate in a randomized, crossover, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, which each participant was submitted to the same testing protocol in four sessions (separated by at least 48 h) with different treatments: LC-phototherapy, SC-phototherapy, LC-placebo, and SC-placebo. The elbow flexion maximal isometric voluntary contraction (MIVC) was performed before and after a fatigue protocol (60 % of MIVC until exhaustion). Electromyography (EMG) of the biceps brachii muscle was collected during all testing procedure. Phototherapy with dose of 60 J per muscle [LC: 33 diodes = 5 lasers (850 nm), 12 LEDs (670 nm), 8 LEDs (880 nm), and 8 LEDs (950 nm); SC: 9 diodes = 5 lasers (850 nm) and 4 LEDs (670 nm)] or placebo applications occurred before fatigue protocol. Two-way ANOVA (treatment and time factors) and one-way ANOVA were used, followed by LSD post hoc. Time to exhaustion was significantly higher in active LC (15 %; p = 0.031) and SC (14 %; p = 0.038) in comparison with their respective placebo treatments, without differences between LC and SC (p > 0.05) or between placebo conditions (p > 0.05). This larger exercise tolerance in phototherapy conditions was not accompanied by a higher decrement in the volunteers' maximal strength capacity (11-15 %; p > 0.05 for all). EMG signals presented no difference between the four condition tested here. In both large and small cluster probes (according parameters tested in this study) led to reduced fatigue in elbow flexor muscles, without difference between them.

Indexed as

ElbowAdolescentAdultArmCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodElectromyographyExercise ToleranceHumansMaleMuscle FatigueMuscle, SkeletalPhototherapyRange of Motion, ArticularYoung AdultErgogenic effect and electromyographyLight-emitting diodes therapyLow-level laser therapyNeuromuscular economy

Identifiers

PMID27272518
OpenAlexW2416464347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.