ArticleObesity surgery2016
Fast-Track in Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery: Feasibility and Cost Analysis Through a Matched-Cohort Study in a Single Centre.
Article in Obesity surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04847037 (Place of Connected Tools in the Follow-up of the Bariatric Patient), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Place of Connected Tools in the Follow-up of the Bariatric Patient: Can They Allow Rapid Management of Complications and Reduce Lost of Follow-up During Postoperative Period?
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Application of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) for Patients Undergoing Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Obesity surgery · 2021Pooled it
- Enhanced recovery programmes versus conventional care in bariatric surgery: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2020Pooled it
- Meta-Analysis of Enhanced Recovery Protocols in Bariatric Surgery.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2018Pooled it
- Efficiency and Safety Effects of Applying ERAS Protocols to Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis of Evidence.Obesity surgery · 2017Pooled it
- Real Robotic 3-arm, 3-port versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a prospective single-center comparative study of operative time, costs and short-term outcomes.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Real Robotic 3-Arm Sleeve Gastrectomy.Obesity surgery · 2024Article
- Complications in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery in an ERABS-optimized, High-Volume, Single Center During 2020 and 2021.Obesity surgery · 2023Observational
- Is an Early Resumption of a Regular Diet After Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Safe?Obesity surgery · 2022Article
- Enhanced recovery after bariatric surgery: an Italian consensus statement.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Article
- Observational
- Analysis of the 'Evaluation Indicators' of an Enhanced Recovery After Bariatric Surgery Pathway in the First Six Months After Implementation.Obesity surgery · 2021Observational
- Impact of Enhanced Recovery After Bariatric Surgery (ERABS) Protocol in Reducing Length of Stay and Hospitalization Costs: the Experience of a Philanthropic Hospital in Brazil.Obesity surgery · 2021Article
- An ERAS protocol for bariatric surgery: is it safe to discharge on post-operative day 1?Surgical endoscopy · 2019Article
- Letter to the Editor Concerning the Publication: "Meta-Analysis of Enhanced Recovery Protocols in Bariatric Surgery".Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2018Article
- Four-Year Evolution of a Thrombophylaxis Protocol in an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Program: Recent Results in 485 Patients.Obesity surgery · 2018Article
- Five Years, Two Surgeons, and over 500 Bariatric Procedures: What Have We Learned?Obesity surgery · 2017Article
- The Effect of Ventilation Strategy on Arterial and Cerebral Oxygenation During Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery.Obesity surgery · 2017Article
- Experience with an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Program for Bariatric Surgery: Comparison of MGB and LSG in 374 Patients.Obesity surgery · 2017Article
- Revisional bariatric surgery after failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding - a single-center, long-term retrospective study.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2017Article
- Innovative solutions in bariatric surgery.Gland surgery · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDue to the rise in severe obesity in Western countries and the increase in bariatric surgery, enhanced recovery (ER) pathways should be developed and promoted.
methodsA monocentric prospective series of 103 bariatric surgery patients managed with the ER pathway (group ER) was compared with a retrospective and immediately previous series of 103 patients managed with standard care (group CS). The aim of the present study was to assess and compare the differences in terms of mean postoperative length of stay (LOS), costs for surgery and recovery, and the differences in terms of complications, readmission, and reoperation rate in the short term between the ER and CS groups.
resultsThe mean LOS was 4.18 days in group CS and 1.79 days in group ER (p < 0.0001). The mean operative time (OT) per patient was 190.20 min in the group CS and 133.54 min in the group ER, resulting in an average cost of 7272.57€ per patient in group CS and 5424.09€ per patient in group ER. The average recovery cost was 1809.94€ for the group CS series and 775.07 for the group ER one. Overall complications (Clavien-Dindo up to II) occurred in 6 patients (5.8 %) in group CS and in 2 patients (1.9 %) in group ER (p = 0.149) and specific complications (Clavien-Dindo IIIb) occurred for 9 patients (8.7 %) in Group CS and for 14 patients (13.5 %) in group ER (p = 0.268) after hospital discharge within 1-month of follow-up. Twelve patients (11.5 %) in group CS and 13 (12.5 %) in group ER were readmitted after discharge (p = 0.831) within 1-month of follow-up; 8 patients (7.7 %) in group CS versus 9 patients (8.8 %) in group ER needed to be reoperated (p = 0.800) within 1-month follow-up.
conclusionsEnhanced recovery pathway reduces significantly LOS in bariatric surgical patients and shortens the mean OT of the procedure, with no significant differences in terms of surgical outcomes. Furthermore, recovery charges were lower and operative time was shorter allowing for procedural cost reduction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.