Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27272150›Full record

ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2017

Frequent MUGA testing in a myeloma patient: A case-based ethics discussion.

Sabha Bhatti, Robert C Hendel, Juan Lopez-Mattei, Ronald G Schwartz, Gilbert Raff, Andrew J Einstein

Abstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The ethics of radiation exposure in cancer-treated patients : Editorial for: Frequent MUGA testing in a myeloma patient: a case-based ethics discussion.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2017
    Article
  2. Cardio-oncology in the older adult.Journal of geriatric oncology · 2017
    Review
  3. Accuracy of left ventricular ejection fraction by contemporary multiple gated acquisition scanning in patients with cancer: comparison with cardiovascular magnetic resonance.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sabha BhattiDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Robert C HendelDepartments of Medicine and Radiology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Juan Lopez-MatteiDivision of Diagnostic Imaging, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Ronald G SchwartzCardiology Division, Department of Medicine, Nuclear Medicine Division, Department of Imaging Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
Gilbert RaffDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA.
Andrew J EinsteinDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Columbia University Medical Center and New York-Presbyterian Hospital, 622 West 168th Street, PH 10-203B, New York, NY, 10032, USA. ae2214@cumc.columbia.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

AccreditationNuclear MedicineHumansBortezomibIntersocietal Accreditation CommissionLeft Ventricular Function AssessmentLenalidomideNuclear Cardiology Laboratory

Identifiers

PMID27272150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.