Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27272104›Full record

ReviewMammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society2016

Genetics of aging bone.

Douglas J Adams, David W Rowe, Cheryl L Ackert-Bicknell

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Douglas J AdamsDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Connecticut Musculoskeletal Institute, University of Connecticut Health, Farmington, CT, 06030, USA.
David W RoweCenter for Regenerative Medicine and Skeletal Development, Department of Reconstructive Sciences, Biomaterials and Skeletal Development, University of Connecticut Health, Farmington, CT, USA.
Cheryl L Ackert-BicknellCenter for Musculoskeletal Research, Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester, 601 Elmwood Ave, Box 665, Rochester, NY, 14624, USA. cheryl_ackertbicknell@URMC.rochester.edu.
UConn Health · USUniversity of Rochester · US

Funding

Skeletal Phenotyping of KOMP MiceR01AR063702 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI ACKERT-BICKNELL, CHERYL LYNNE, ROWE, DAVID W. · 2013 to 2017
$3.2M
Co-localizing Quantitative Trait Loci for Bone Mineral Density and HDL in MiceR01AR060234 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI ACKERT-BICKNELL, CHERYL LYNNE · 2010 to 2014
$1.5M
Phenotyping Skeletal QTLs in a DO Mouse PopulationR21AR064941 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI ROWE, DAVID W. · 2014 to 2015
$414k
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR060234NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR063702NIAMS NIH HHS R21 AR064941
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With aging, the skeleton experiences a number of changes, which include reductions in mass and changes in matrix composition, leading to fragility and ultimately an increase of fracture risk. A number of aspects of bone physiology are controlled by genetic factors, including peak bone mass, bone shape, and composition; however, forward genetic studies in humans have largely concentrated on clinically available measures such as bone mineral density (BMD). Forward genetic studies in rodents have also heavily focused on BMD; however, investigations of direct measures of bone strength, size, and shape have also been conducted. Overwhelmingly, these studies of the genetics of bone strength have identified loci that modulate strength via influencing bone size, and may not impact the matrix material properties of bone. Many of the rodent forward genetic studies lacked sufficient mapping resolution for candidate gene identification; however, newer studies using genetic mapping populations such as Advanced Intercrosses and the Collaborative Cross appear to have overcome this issue and show promise for future studies. The majority of the genetic mapping studies conducted to date have focused on younger animals and thus an understanding of the genetic control of age-related bone loss represents a key gap in knowledge.

Indexed as

AgingBone DensityChromosome MappingFractures, BoneHumansOsteoporosisSkeleton

Identifiers

PMID27272104
PMCPMC4948189
OpenAlexW2427941734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.