ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2016
The interplay between effector binding and allostery in an engineered protein switch.
Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Expanding the bioanalytical application of β-hydroxybutyrate binding proteins through characterization of their metabolite interactions and site-directed mutagenesis.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025Article
- Computational design of Periplasmic binding protein biosensors guided by molecular dynamics.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Development and structural characterization of an engineered multi-copper oxidase reporter of protein-protein interactions.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2019Article
- Converting a Periplasmic Binding Protein into a Synthetic Biosensing Switch through Domain Insertion.BioMed research international · 2019Review
- Full and Partial Agonism of a Designed Enzyme Switch.ACS synthetic biology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The protein design rules for engineering allosteric regulation are not well understood. A fundamental understanding of the determinants of ligand binding in an allosteric context could facilitate the design and construction of versatile protein switches and biosensors. Here, we conducted extensive in vitro and in vivo characterization of the effects of 285 unique point mutations at 15 residues in the maltose-binding pocket of the maltose-activated β-lactamase MBP317-347. MBP317-347 is an allosteric enzyme formed by the insertion of TEM-1 β-lactamase into the E. coli maltose binding protein (MBP). We find that the maltose-dependent resistance to ampicillin conferred to the cells by the MBP317-347 switch gene (the switch phenotype) is very robust to mutations, with most mutations slightly improving the switch phenotype. We identified 15 mutations that improved switch performance from twofold to 22-fold, primarily by decreasing the catalytic activity in the absence of maltose, perhaps by disrupting interactions that cause a small fraction of MBP in solution to exist in a partially closed state in the absence of maltose. Other notable mutations include K15D and K15H that increased maltose affinity 30-fold and Y155K and Y155R that compromised switching by diminishing the ability of maltose to increase catalytic activity. The data also provided insights into normal MBP physiology, as select mutations at D14, W62, and F156 retained high maltose affinity but abolished the switch's ability to substitute for MBP in the transport of maltose into the cell. The results reveal the complex relationship between ligand binding and allostery in this engineered switch.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.