Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27272021›Full record

ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2016

The interplay between effector binding and allostery in an engineered protein switch.

Jay H Choi, Tina Xiong, Marc Ostermeier

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jay H ChoiDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, 3400 N. Charles St, Baltimore, Maryland, 21218.
Tina XiongDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, 3400 N. Charles St, Baltimore, Maryland, 21218.
Marc OstermeierDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, 3400 N. Charles St, Baltimore, Maryland, 21218.
University of Baltimore · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

The Combinatorial Design of Protein Molecular SwitchesR01GM066972 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI OSTERMEIER, MARC A · 2003 to 2016
$4.0M
The Chemistry-Biology Interface Program at Johns Hopkins UniversityT32GM080189 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ROKITA, STEVEN E · 2008 to 2022
$3.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM066972NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM080189
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The protein design rules for engineering allosteric regulation are not well understood. A fundamental understanding of the determinants of ligand binding in an allosteric context could facilitate the design and construction of versatile protein switches and biosensors. Here, we conducted extensive in vitro and in vivo characterization of the effects of 285 unique point mutations at 15 residues in the maltose-binding pocket of the maltose-activated β-lactamase MBP317-347. MBP317-347 is an allosteric enzyme formed by the insertion of TEM-1 β-lactamase into the E. coli maltose binding protein (MBP). We find that the maltose-dependent resistance to ampicillin conferred to the cells by the MBP317-347 switch gene (the switch phenotype) is very robust to mutations, with most mutations slightly improving the switch phenotype. We identified 15 mutations that improved switch performance from twofold to 22-fold, primarily by decreasing the catalytic activity in the absence of maltose, perhaps by disrupting interactions that cause a small fraction of MBP in solution to exist in a partially closed state in the absence of maltose. Other notable mutations include K15D and K15H that increased maltose affinity 30-fold and Y155K and Y155R that compromised switching by diminishing the ability of maltose to increase catalytic activity. The data also provided insights into normal MBP physiology, as select mutations at D14, W62, and F156 retained high maltose affinity but abolished the switch's ability to substitute for MBP in the transport of maltose into the cell. The results reveal the complex relationship between ligand binding and allostery in this engineered switch.

Indexed as

Amino Acid Substitutionbeta-LactamasesMaltose-Binding ProteinsMutation, MissenseRecombinant Fusion ProteinsAllosteric RegulationEscherichia colibeta-Lactamasesbeta-lactamase TEM-1Maltose-Binding ProteinsRecombinant Fusion Proteinsallosteryligand bindingmaltose binding proteinmaltose transportprotein engineeringprotein switch

Identifiers

PMID27272021
PMCPMC5338240
OpenAlexW2416673602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.