ReviewClinical journal of gastroenterology2016
Diagnosis and treatment of microscopic colitis.
Review in Clinical journal of gastroenterology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of Inhibitory Effect of Abatacept (CTLA4-ig) and Conditioned Medium of Mesenchymal Stem Cell in an Acetic Acid-induced Mouse Model of Acute Colitis.International journal of molecular and cellular medicine · 2023Article
- Spontaneous colonic perforation with collagenous colitis in an elderly patient.Clinical journal of gastroenterology · 2022Article
- Collagenous Colitis Possibly Associated with Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2022Article
- Proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for the treatment of collagenous colitis.Clinical journal of gastroenterology · 2022Article
- Analysis of Clinical and Histopathological Findings in Microscopic Colitis.Turk patoloji dergisi · 2022Article
- Collagenous colitis in a child induced by chronic respiratory allergy: A case report.Medicine · 2020Article
- Beclomethasone dipropionate in microscopic colitis: Results of an exploratory open-label multicentre study (COLCO).United European gastroenterology journal · 2019Observational
- Management of elderly ulcerative colitis in Japan.Journal of gastroenterology · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microscopic colitis (MC) designates two types of chronic diarrhea diseases, which are lymphocytic colitis and collagenous colitis. The prevalence of microscopic colitis is increasing in both Western and Eastern countries, possibly due to the high incidence of colonoscopic survey in chronic diarrhea patients. Although the overall prognosis of MC patients is mostly good, it should be noted that appropriate diagnosis and choice of treatment is required to assure a good clinical outcome for MC patients. Also, a certain population of MC patients may take a severe and refractory clinical course, and thus require advanced clinical care using medications supported by less evidence. In this review, we would like to feature the essential points regarding the diagnosis of MC, and also describe the current standard of treatments for MC patients. In addition, we would like to add some findings from the national survey and research carried out in Japan, to compare those data with the western countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.