Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27271710›Full record

ArticleCerebellum (London, England)2017

Exploration and Identification of Cortico-Cerebellar-Brainstem Closed Loop During a Motivational-Motor Task: an fMRI Study.

Chama Belkhiria, Tarak Driss, Christophe Habas, Hamdi Jaafar, Remy Guillevin, Giovanni de Marco

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebellum (London, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Striatal and cerebellar interactions during reward-based motor performance.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Neural and Behavioral Markers of Negative Symptoms and Cognitive Impairment in Patients with Psychosis.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chama BelkhiriaLaboratoire CeRSM (EA 2931), Equipe "Analyse du Mouvement en Biomécanique, Physiologie et Imagerie". UFR STAPS, Université Paris Ouest Nanterre La Défense, 200 avenue de la République, 92000, Nanterre, France. belkhiriachema@hotmail.fr.
Tarak DrissLaboratoire CeRSM (EA 2931), Equipe "Analyse du Mouvement en Biomécanique, Physiologie et Imagerie". UFR STAPS, Université Paris Ouest Nanterre La Défense, 200 avenue de la République, 92000, Nanterre, France.
Christophe HabasService de Neuro-Imagerie, Hôpital des Quinze-Vingts, UPMC Paris 6, 28, rue de Charenton, 75012, Paris, France.
Hamdi JaafarLaboratoire CeRSM (EA 2931), Equipe "Analyse du Mouvement en Biomécanique, Physiologie et Imagerie". UFR STAPS, Université Paris Ouest Nanterre La Défense, 200 avenue de la République, 92000, Nanterre, France.
Remy GuillevinAssistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Groupe hospitalier la Pitié Salpêtrière, service de Neuro-Radiologie, Paris, France.
Giovanni de MarcoLaboratoire CeRSM (EA 2931), Equipe "Analyse du Mouvement en Biomécanique, Physiologie et Imagerie". UFR STAPS, Université Paris Ouest Nanterre La Défense, 200 avenue de la République, 92000, Nanterre, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cerebellum is involved not only in motor coordination, training, and memory, but also in cognition and emotion. Lobule VI in particular belongs to sensorimotor, salience, and executive cerebellar networks. This study aims to determine whether lobule VI would constitute an integrative interface between motor and cognitive/emotional circuits during a motor task with verbal encouragement, likely in conjunction with the basal ganglia (reward and motivational system). We used fMRI to identify specific recruitment of cerebellar and striatal systems during physical performance using two motor tasks with and without encouragement. We found that: (i) Force results were higher during verbal encouragement than during basal condition in all participants. (ii) The anterior part of the right lobule VI was activated by motor execution in both tasks, while its posterior part was specifically activated by verbal encouragement. (iii) The closed-connectivity loop maintained motivation induced by verbal encouragement between cerebral and cerebellar through the red nucleus and striatal network. Therefore, right lobule VI is a hub-controlling sensorimotor and motivates aspects of motor performance in relation with the red nucleus and the ventral striatum. These results could have important implications for extrapyramidal and multisystem degenerative diseases.

Indexed as

AdultBrain MappingCerebellumCerebral CortexFeedback, PsychologicalFemaleHandHand StrengthHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMotivationMotor ActivityNeural PathwaysNeuropsychological TestsSurveys and QuestionnairesCerebellumfMRILobule VIMotivationMotorRed nucleus

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.