Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27271705›Full record

ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2016

Family Communication in Inherited Cardiovascular Conditions in Ireland.

Sinead Whyte, Andrew Green, Marion McAllister, Hannah Shipman

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. A systematic literature review of disclosure practices and reported outcomes for medically actionable genomic secondary findings.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Role of Genetics in the Management of Heart Failure Patients.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  6. An Examination of the Ethical and Legal Limits in Implementing "Traceback Testing" for Deceased Patients.The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sinead WhyteCentre for Medical Education, School of Medicine, Institute of Medical Genetics, Cardiff University, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XW, UK. Sinead.whyte1@nhs.net.
Andrew GreenNational Centre for Medical Genetics, Our Lady's Hospital, Crumlin, Dublin 12, Ireland.
Marion McAllisterCentre for Medical Education, School of Medicine, Institute of Medical Genetics, Cardiff University, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XW, UK.
Hannah ShipmanDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Addenbrooke's Hospital NHS Trust, PO Box 134, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over 100,000 individuals living in Ireland carry a mutated gene for an inherited cardiac condition (ICC), most of which demonstrate an autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance. First-degree relatives of individuals with these mutations are at a 50 % risk of being a carrier: disclosing genetic information to family members can be complex. This study explored how families living in Ireland communicate genetic information about ICCs and looked at the challenges of communicating information, factors that may affect communication and what influence this had on family relationships. Face to face interviews were conducted with nine participants using an approved topic guide and results analysed using thematic analysis. The participants disclosed that responsibility to future generations, gender, proximity and lack of contact all played a role in family communication. The media was cited as a source of information about genetic information and knowledge of genetic information tended to have a positive effect on families. Results from this study indicate that individuals are willing to inform family members, particularly when there are children and grandchildren at risk, and different strategies are utilised. Furthermore, understanding of genetics is partially regulated not only by their families, but by the way society handles information. Therefore, genetic health professionals should take into account the familial influence on individuals and their decision to attend genetic services, and also that of the media.

Indexed as

CommunicationFamily RelationsGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic TestingAdultCardiovascular DiseasesDisclosureFamilyFemaleHumansIrelandMaleMutationCommunicationFamilyGeneticsInherited cardiac conditions

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.