ArticleExperimental brain research2016
Exogenous orienting of attention in hearing: a virtual reality paradigm to assess auditory attention in neglect patients.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Virtual reality for the assessment and rehabilitation of neglect: where are we now? A 6-year review update.Virtual reality · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While mechanisms of orienting attention in unilateral spatial neglect (USN) have frequently been studied in the visual domain, these mechanisms remain relatively unexplored in the auditory domain. Our first goal was to replicate Spence and Driver's (J Exp Psychol Hum 22:1005-1030, 1994) results with a virtual reality paradigm. This paradigm simulated a 3-dimensional auditory space with headphones. Our second aim was to study auditory profiles of orienting attention in USN. In a first experiment, 18 healthy participants performed an auditory cueing spatial paradigm (either a target-detection task or a target-lateralization task). In a second experiment, 14 right-stroke patients (10 with USN and 4 without USN) performed these two same tasks. As in Spence and Driver's (J Exp Psychol Hum 22:1005-1030, 1994), our first experiment showed that spatial representations are not utilized for the detection of auditory stimuli. However, during the lateralization task, participants were quicker to detect targets preceded by a spatially congruent cue, which suggests that our paradigm could be suitable for studying orienting attention in hearing. Our second experiment found that patients with USN also needed an explicit spatial task to be sensitive to auditory spatial cueing. In the target-lateralization task, they showed effects lateralized only to one side of space, whereas patients without USN did not. Although our paradigm needs replications to better understand orienting attention impairments in hearing in USN, this study could have implications for the development of clinical tasks that could assess auditory spatial attention in USN syndrome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.