Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27271660›Full record

ReviewNutrients2016

Biomarkers of Aging: From Function to Molecular Biology.

Karl-Heinz Wagner, David Cameron-Smith, Barbara Wessner, Bernhard Franzke

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrients, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 160 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
160citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

160 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

100 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Karl-Heinz WagnerResearch Platform Active Ageing, University of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14, Vienna 1090, Austria. karl-heinz.wagner@univie.ac.at.
David Cameron-SmithLiggins Institute, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand. d.cameron-smith@auckland.ac.nz.
Barbara WessnerResearch Platform Active Ageing, University of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14, Vienna 1090, Austria. barbara.wessner@univie.ac.at.
Bernhard FranzkeResearch Platform Active Ageing, University of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14, Vienna 1090, Austria. bernhard.franzke@univie.ac.at.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aging is a major risk factor for most chronic diseases and functional impairments. Within a homogeneous age sample there is a considerable variation in the extent of disease and functional impairment risk, revealing a need for valid biomarkers to aid in characterizing the complex aging processes. The identification of biomarkers is further complicated by the diversity of biological living situations, lifestyle activities and medical treatments. Thus, there has been no identification of a single biomarker or gold standard tool that can monitor successful or healthy aging. Within this short review the current knowledge of putative biomarkers is presented, focusing on their application to the major physiological mechanisms affected by the aging process including physical capability, nutritional status, body composition, endocrine and immune function. This review emphasizes molecular and DNA-based biomarkers, as well as recent advances in other biomarkers such as microRNAs, bilirubin or advanced glycation end products.

Indexed as

AgingBilirubinBiomarkersDNAGlycation End Products, AdvancedHumansMicroRNAsBilirubinBiomarkersDNAGlycation End Products, AdvancedMicroRNAsagingbiomarkerDNA based markerinflammagingmiRNAmolecular markerphysical function

Identifiers

PMID27271660
PMCPMC4924179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.