Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27271652›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2016

Health-Care Waste Treatment Technology Selection Using the Interval 2-Tuple Induced TOPSIS Method.

Chao Lu, Jian-Xin You, Hu-Chen Liu, Ping Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Identifying Key Performance Indicators for Holistic Hospital Management with a Modified DEMATEL Approach.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chao LuSchool of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China. chaolu@shu.edu.cn.
Jian-Xin YouSchool of Economics and Management, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China. yjx2256@vip.sina.com.
Hu-Chen LiuSchool of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China. huchenliu@foxmail.com.
Ping LiZhoupu Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Medicine & Health Sciences, Shanghai 201318, China. yiwuchulp@126.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health-care waste (HCW) management is a major challenge for municipalities, particularly in the cities of developing nations. Selecting the best treatment technology for HCW can be regarded as a complex multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) issue involving a number of alternatives and multiple evaluation criteria. In addition, decision makers tend to express their personal assessments via multi-granularity linguistic term sets because of different backgrounds and knowledge, some of which may be imprecise, uncertain and incomplete. Therefore, the main objective of this study is to propose a new hybrid decision making approach combining interval 2-tuple induced distance operators with the technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS) for tackling HCW treatment technology selection problems with linguistic information. The proposed interval 2-tuple induced TOPSIS (ITI-TOPSIS) can not only model the uncertainty and diversity of the assessment information given by decision makers, but also reflect the complex attitudinal characters of decision makers and provide much more complete information for the selection of the optimum disposal alternative. Finally, an empirical example in Shanghai, China is provided to illustrate the proposed decision making method, and results show that the ITI-TOPSIS proposed in this paper can solve the problem of HCW treatment technology selection effectively.

Indexed as

Decision Support TechniquesChinaCitiesConservation of Natural ResourcesMedical Waste DisposalModels, TheoreticalWaste ManagementMedical Waste Disposaldistance measuresHCW treatment technologyhealth-care waste managementinterval 2-tupleTOPSIS

Identifiers

PMID27271652
PMCPMC4924019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.