Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27271569›Full record

ArticleJournal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950)2016

Constitutive Lck Activity Drives Sensitivity Differences between CD8+ Memory T Cell Subsets.

Duane Moogk, Shi Zhong, Zhiya Yu, Ivan Liadi, William Rittase, Victoria Fang, Janna Dougherty, Arianne Perez-Garcia, Iman Osman, Cheng Zhu and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Duane MoogkLaura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016;
Shi ZhongLaura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016;
Zhiya YuCenter for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892;ORCID 0000-0003-3742-5902
Ivan LiadiDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Houston, TX 77004;ORCID 0000-0003-3830-6569
William RittaseGeorge W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332;ORCID 0000-0003-4268-3148
Victoria FangLaura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016; New York University Medical Scientist Training Program, New York, NY 10016;ORCID 0000-0001-9376-1279
Janna DoughertyLaura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016;
Arianne Perez-GarciaLaura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016;
Iman OsmanLaura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016; Ronald Perelman Department of Dermatology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016;
Cheng ZhuGeorge W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332;ORCID 0000-0002-1718-565X
Navin VaradarajanDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Houston, TX 77004;ORCID 0000-0001-7524-8228
Nicholas P RestifoCenter for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892;
Alan B FreyDepartment of Cell Biology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016; and.
Michelle KrogsgaardLaura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016; Department of Pathology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016 Michelle.Krogsgaard@nyumc.org.
New York University · USGeorgia Institute of Technology · USNational Institutes of Health · USUniversity of Houston · US

Funding

Vaccine FacilityP30CA016087 · NCI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI ADRIANA HEGUY · 1985 to 2026
$83.1M
Building on the success of the adoptive immunotherapy of cancerZIABC010763 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI ROSENBERG, STEVEN · 2009 to 2020
$25.0M
Research Training Program Plan on Cell and Tissue Engineering (CTEng)T32GM008433 · NIGMS · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI GARCIA, ANDRES J · 1991 to 2021
$7.1M
Restoring Animal Research Resources Lost Due to Super Storm SandyR24OD018339 · OD · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI LEVY, DAVID E · 2014 to 2014
$6.7M
Quantitative single-cell biomarkers of T-cells to optimize tumor immunotherapyR01CA174385 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON · PI COOPER, LAURENCE J.N., VARADARAJAN, NAVIN · 2012 to 2015
$2.1M
Visualizing ligand-induced signal propagation in the TCR-signaling complexR01GM085586 · NIGMS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI KROGSGAARD, MICHELLE · 2008 to 2014
$1.5M
Tumor-Induced Defective CTL Lytic FunctionR01CA108573 · NCI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI FREY, ALAN B · 2006 to 2010
$1.5M
Biophysical analysis of T-cell discrimination among classes of self-ligandsU01CA137070 · NCI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI KROGSGAARD, MICHELLE · 2009 to 2010
$701k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016087NCI NIH HHS R01 CA108573NCI NIH HHS R01 CA174385NCI NIH HHS U01 CA137070NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM085586NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008433NIH HHS R24 OD018339
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CD8(+) T cells develop increased sensitivity following Ag experience, and differences in sensitivity exist between T cell memory subsets. How differential TCR signaling between memory subsets contributes to sensitivity differences is unclear. We show in mouse effector memory T cells (TEM) that >50% of lymphocyte-specific protein tyrosine kinase (Lck) exists in a constitutively active conformation, compared with <20% in central memory T cells (TCM). Immediately proximal to Lck signaling, we observed enhanced Zap-70 phosphorylation in TEM following TCR ligation compared with TCM Furthermore, we observed superior cytotoxic effector function in TEM compared with TCM, and we provide evidence that this results from a lower probability of TCM reaching threshold signaling owing to the decreased magnitude of TCR-proximal signaling. We provide evidence that the differences in Lck constitutive activity between CD8(+) TCM and TEM are due to differential regulation by SH2 domain-containing phosphatase-1 (Shp-1) and C-terminal Src kinase, and we use modeling of early TCR signaling to reveal the significance of these differences. We show that inhibition of Shp-1 results in increased constitutive Lck activity in TCM to levels similar to TEM, as well as increased cytotoxic effector function in TCM Collectively, this work demonstrates a role for constitutive Lck activity in controlling Ag sensitivity, and it suggests that differential activities of TCR-proximal signaling components may contribute to establishing the divergent effector properties of TCM and TEM. This work also identifies Shp-1 as a potential target to improve the cytotoxic effector functions of TCM for adoptive cell therapy applications.

Indexed as

AnimalsBlotting, WesternCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesCytotoxicity, ImmunologicFlow CytometryHumansImmunologic MemoryLymphocyte ActivationLymphocyte Specific Protein Tyrosine Kinase p56(lck)Markov ChainsMicePolymerase Chain ReactionTime-Lapse ImagingT-Lymphocyte SubsetsLymphocyte Specific Protein Tyrosine Kinase p56(lck)

Identifiers

PMID27271569
PMCPMC4935560
OpenAlexW2414379043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.