Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27271517›Full record

Trial reportDer Nervenarzt2017

[Implementation of the recommendations for psychotherapy after psychiatric inpatient treatment : Results of the PAKT study Part II].

C Uhlmann, E Flammer, C Pfiffner, J Grempler, G Längle, G-W Eschweiler, H Spießl, T Steinert

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Der Nervenarzt, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

C UhlmannZfP Südwürttemberg, Versorgungsforschung Weissenau, Klinik Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie I, Universität Ulm, Weingartshofer Str. 2, 88214, Ravensburg, Deutschland. carmen.uhlmann@zfp-zentrum.de.
E FlammerZfP Südwürttemberg, Versorgungsforschung Weissenau, Klinik Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie I, Universität Ulm, Weingartshofer Str. 2, 88214, Ravensburg, Deutschland.
C PfiffnerZfP Südwürttemberg, Versorgungsforschung Weissenau, Klinik Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie I, Universität Ulm, Weingartshofer Str. 2, 88214, Ravensburg, Deutschland.
J GremplerZfP Südwürttemberg, Versorgungsforschung Weissenau, Klinik Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie I, Universität Ulm, Weingartshofer Str. 2, 88214, Ravensburg, Deutschland.
G LängleZentrum für Psychiatrie Südwürttemberg, 88427, Bad Schussenried, Deutschland.
G-W EschweilerUniversitätsklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Universität Tübingen, 72076, Tübingen, Deutschland.
H SpießlKlinik für Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie und Psychosomatik, Bezirkskrankenhaus Landshut, 84034, Landshut, Deutschland.
T SteinertZfP Südwürttemberg, Versorgungsforschung Weissenau, Klinik Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie I, Universität Ulm, Weingartshofer Str. 2, 88214, Ravensburg, Deutschland.
Universität Ulm · DEKlinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie · DEUniversity of Applied Sciences Landshut · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWaiting periods for inpatient or outpatient psychotherapeutic treatment are generally considerable. For patients treated in a psychiatric day-clinic or hospital, implementation of a recommended subsequent psychotherapeutic treatment might be difficult.

objectivesIn part II of the psychotherapy after hospital or day clinic (PAKT) study, we examined how the recommendation for psychotherapy can be implemented after psychiatric treatment. MATERIALS AND

methodsThree months after discharge from one of four psychiatric hospitals in southern Germany, we interviewed 306 patients who received a recommendation for psychotherapeutic treatment after their hospital stays if the recommendation was implemented successfully.

resultsOnly about 12 % of the patients in the follow-up group were unable to implement the general recommendation for psychotherapy after psychiatric stay despite motivation for psychotherapeutic treatment. In the case of recommendation for outpatient psychotherapy, 20 % were unsuccessful. Predictors for successful implementation were education and employment, whereas variables like age, gender, diagnosis, or severity of disorder did not play a significant role.

conclusionsThe relatively small percentage of unimplemented psychotherapeutic treatment is surprising at a first glance. However, the proportion recommended for psychotherapy after psychiatric stay was less than 10 %, as shown in the first part of the study (see PAKT Study Part I, doi:s00115-016-0107-z).

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overEvidence-Based MedicineGermanyGuideline AdherenceHospitals, PsychiatricHumansInpatientsMental DisordersMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionPrevalencePsychotherapyImplementationPredictorsPsychiatryPsychotherapyUtilization

Identifiers

PMID27271517
OpenAlexW2415791325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.