Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27271304›Full record

ReviewEJNMMI physics2016

Physics of pure and non-pure positron emitters for PET: a review and a discussion.

Maurizio Conti, Lars Eriksson

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EJNMMI physics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 169 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
169citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
16.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

169 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 380 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Comparison ofFrontiers in oncology · 2023
    Pooled it
  5. State-of-the-art of FAPI-PET imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Quantitative Comparison of SPECT and PET Performance for Clinical Theranostic Applications.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Integrated [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  20. cGMP-compliant high-yield automated production of [EJNMMI radiopharmacy and chemistry · 2025
    Article

109 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Commented on by
    Al2019
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Maurizio ContiSiemens Healthcare Molecular Imaging, Knoxville, TN, USA. maurizioconti@siemens.com.
Lars ErikssonSiemens Healthcare Molecular Imaging, Knoxville, TN, USA.
Siemens Healthcare (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the increased interest in new PET tracers, gene-targeted therapy, immunoPET, and theranostics, other radioisotopes will be increasingly used in clinical PET scanners, in addition to (18)F. Some of the most interesting radioisotopes with prospective use in the new fields are not pure short-range β(+) emitters but can be associated with gamma emissions in coincidence with the annihilation radiation (prompt gamma), gamma-gamma cascades, intense Bremsstrahlung radiation, high-energy positrons that may escape out of the patient skin, and high-energy gamma rays that result in some e (+)/e (-) pair production. The high level of sophistication in data correction and excellent quantitative accuracy that has been reached for (18)F in recent years can be questioned by these effects. In this work, we review the physics and the scientific literature and evaluate the effect of these additional phenomena on the PET data for each of a series of radioisotopes: (11)C, (13)N, (15)O, (18)F, (64)Cu, (68)Ga, (76)Br, (82)Rb, (86)Y, (89)Zr, (90)Y, and (124)I. In particular, we discuss the present complications arising from the prompt gammas, and we review the scientific literature on prompt gamma correction. For some of the radioisotopes considered in this work, prompt gamma correction is definitely needed to assure acceptable image quality, and several approaches have been proposed in recent years. Bremsstrahlung photons and (176)Lu background were also evaluated.

Indexed as

Non-conventional PET isotopesPETPositron emitterPrompt gammaRadioisotopes

Identifiers

PMID27271304
PMCPMC4894854
OpenAlexW2395989253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.