ArticleZeitschrift fur Rheumatologie2016
[Improvement of the diagnostic accuracy in patients with suspected rheumatic disease by preselection in the early arthritis clinic : An alternative to the appointment service point model of the Healthcare Improvement Act].
Article in Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prioritising Appointments by Telephone Interview: Duration from Symptom Onset to Appointment Request Predicts Likelihood of Inflammatory Rheumatic Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The diagnosis and treatment of inflammatory rheumatic diseases can be delayed by a long waiting period for an appointment with a rheumatologist. This study investigated whether preselection of patients in an early arthritis clinic is a suitable tool to improve this situation. In 2006 an early arthritis clinic was founded by the Collaborating Center of Rheumatology in Halle (Saale). General practitioners refer patients by using a special registration form that helps to identify patients with an early joint swelling or inflammatory back pain. Patients are then allocated to a pool of participating rheumatologists and are seen by one of them within 2 weeks. For our scientific evaluation the data of 248 patients from the early arthritis clinic and data of 187 regular patients were gathered by means of an additional questionnaire for rheumatologists and patients. In the early arthritis clinic 40.3 % of patients received the diagnosis of an inflammatory rheumatic disease compared with 19.3 % in the control group. In the latter group 51 % were diagnosed as having degenerative joint or spine disorders compared with 22 % in patients from the early arthritis clinic; however, 61 % of patients who were referred to the early arthritis clinic did not fulfill the criteria of the registration form. On the other hand, patients in this group fulfilling these criteria had an inflammatory rheumatic disease in 68.1 % of the cases. The mean duration of symptoms at the time of first rheumatological consultation was significantly shorter in the early arthritis clinic than in the control group (6 vs. 39 months). Our data demonstrate that the preselection of patients can serve as a useful instrument to guide the referral of patients to rheumatologists. The high percentage of patients who did not fulfil the criteria of the registration form indicates that a further improvement of this form is necessary and stresses the need for intensive communication between rheumatologists and general practitioners. Early arthritis clinics may be an alternative to the current efforts of the legislative authorities to improve specialist care by centralized distribution of specialist appointments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27270954What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.