Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27270907›Full record

ReviewDer Internist2016

[Bone metastases : New aspects of pathogenesis and systemic therapy].

T D Rachner, F Jakob, L C Hofbauer

Abstract readCase ReportsReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Internist, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

T D RachnerBereich Endokrinologie/Diabetes/Metabolische Knochenerkrankungen, Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik III, Universitätsklinikum der Technischen Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland.
F JakobExperimentelle und Klinische Osteologie, Lehrstuhl Orthopädie, Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Deutschland.
L C HofbauerBereich Endokrinologie/Diabetes/Metabolische Knochenerkrankungen, Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik III, Universitätsklinikum der Technischen Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland. lorenz.hofbauer@uniklinikum-dresden.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The occurrence of bone metastases, in particular secondary to breast and prostate cancer, represents a complex medical condition that is debilitating for affected patients. In order to provide an efficient and personalized therapy, an interdisciplinary treatment approach is mandatory; therefore, systemic pharmacological therapy represents a core element of the overall treatment concept. In terms of pathophysiology, the cancer cells cause a massive disturbance of the local bone microenvironment, which as a rule leads to activation of bone resorbing osteoclasts. In addition to bisphosphonates, which can be considered classical antiresorptive agents, the monoclonal receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand (RANKL) antibody denosumab has been in use in clinical practice since 2011. The alpha-emitting radioisotope Alpharadin was also recently approved for the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer. This article provides a summary of the most recent knowledge on the pathogenesis of how cancer cells alter the bone microenvironment as well as a review of established and future systemic treatment options.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBone Density Conservation AgentsBone NeoplasmsChemoradiotherapy, AdjuvantCombined Modality TherapyDenosumabDose Fractionation, RadiationDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Administration ScheduleEvidence-Based MedicineHumansTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic AgentsBone Density Conservation AgentsDenosumabBreast cancerDenosumabOsteoblastsOsteoclastsProstate cancer

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.