Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27270749›Full record

GuidelinePLoS medicine2016

Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology-Nutritional Epidemiology (STROBE-nut): An Extension of the STROBE Statement.

Carl Lachat, Dana Hawwash, Marga C Ocké, Christina Berg, Elisabet Forsum, Agneta Hörnell, Christel Larsson, Emily Sonestedt, Elisabet Wirfält, Agneta Åkesson and 9 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readGuideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in PLoS medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 289 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
289citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07104669 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Sports Nutrition Assessment Program at the University of Alicante

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of AlicanteRan2025 to 2031Enrolled100ConditionsDiet Habit, Body Weight, Athlete FootArmsdiet, Physical activity, body composition, hydration status, health status
NCT07464899 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Anthropometric, Dietary, Exercise, and Supplementation Profile in Athletes With Disabilities (PADES)

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of AlicanteRan2024 to 2030Enrolled300ConditionsDiet Habits, Body Composition, Athlete Assessment, Sport NutritionArmsDiet, body composition, Physical activity, health status
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

289 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Integrative development of a short screening questionnaire of highly processed food consumption (sQ-HPF).The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2022
    Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

229 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Carl LachatDepartment of Food Safety and Food Quality, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-1389-8855
Dana HawwashDepartment of Food Safety and Food Quality, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Marga C OckéNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
Christina BergDepartment of Food and Nutrition, and Sport Science, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Elisabet ForsumDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Agneta HörnellDepartment of Food and Nutrition, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-5464-5686
Christel LarssonDepartment of Food and Nutrition, and Sport Science, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-5785-0271
Emily SonestedtDepartment of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Elisabet WirfältDepartment of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Agneta ÅkessonInstitute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Patrick KolsterenDepartment of Food Safety and Food Quality, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Graham ByrnesInternational Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.
Willem De KeyzerDepartment of Biosciences and Food Sciences, University College Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.
John Van CampDepartment of Food Safety and Food Quality, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Janet E CadeNutritional Epidemiology Group, School of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3421-0121
Nadia SlimaniInternational Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.
Myriam CevallosDepartment of Clinical Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Matthias EggerInstitute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Inge HuybrechtsInternational Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/L02019X/1World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConcerns have been raised about the quality of reporting in nutritional epidemiology. Research reporting guidelines such as the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement can improve quality of reporting in observational studies. Herein, we propose recommendations for reporting nutritional epidemiology and dietary assessment research by extending the STROBE statement into Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology-Nutritional Epidemiology (STROBE-nut). METHODS AND

findingsRecommendations for the reporting of nutritional epidemiology and dietary assessment research were developed following a systematic and consultative process, coordinated by a multidisciplinary group of 21 experts. Consensus on reporting guidelines was reached through a three-round Delphi consultation process with 53 external experts. In total, 24 recommendations for nutritional epidemiology were added to the STROBE checklist.

conclusionWhen used appropriately, reporting guidelines for nutritional epidemiology can contribute to improve reporting of observational studies with a focus on diet and health.

Indexed as

Epidemiologic Research DesignNutritional SciencesObservational Studies as TopicResearch ReportChecklistGuidelines as TopicHumans

Identifiers

PMID27270749
PMCPMC4896435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.