Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27270738›Full record

ReviewCanadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie2016

The 2013 Canadian Forces Mental Health Survey: Background and Methods.

Mark A Zamorski, Rachel E Bennett, David Boulos, Bryan G Garber, Rakesh Jetly, Jitender Sareen

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
14.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Discontinuation of mental health treatment among Canadian military personnel.Journal of military, veteran and family health · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Mental Health Service Utilization in Depressed Canadian Armed Forces Personnel.Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Mental Disorder, Psychological Distress, and Functional Status in Canadian Military Personnel.Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mark A ZamorskiDirectorate of Mental Health, Canadian Forces Health Services Group, Ottawa, Ontario Department of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario mark.zamorski@forces.gc.ca.
Rachel E BennettDirectorate of Mental Health, Canadian Forces Health Services Group, Ottawa, Ontario.
David BoulosDirectorate of Mental Health, Canadian Forces Health Services Group, Ottawa, Ontario.
Bryan G GarberDirectorate of Mental Health, Canadian Forces Health Services Group, Ottawa, Ontario.
Rakesh JetlyDirectorate of Mental Health, Canadian Forces Health Services Group, Ottawa, Ontario.
Jitender SareenDepartments of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba.
Canadian Armed Forces · CAUniversity of Manitoba · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe 2013 Canadian Forces Mental Health Survey (CFMHS) collected detailed information on mental health problems, their impacts, occupational and nonoccupational determinants of mental health, and the use of mental health services from a random sample of 8200 serving personnel. The objective of this article is to provide a firm scientific foundation for understanding and interpreting the CFMHS findings.

methodsThis narrative review first provides a snapshot of the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF), focusing on 2 key determinants of mental health: the deployment of more than 40,000 personnel in support of the mission in Afghanistan and the extensive renewal of the CAF mental health system. The findings of recent population-based CAF mental health research are reviewed, with a focus on findings from the very similar mental health survey done in 2002. Finally, key aspects of the methods of the 2013 CFMHS are presented.

resultsThe findings of 20 peer-reviewed publications using the 2002 mental health survey data are reviewed, along with those of 25 publications from other major CAF mental health research projects executed over the past decade.

conclusionsMore than a decade of population-based mental health research in the CAF has provided a detailed picture of its mental health and use of mental health services. This knowledge base and the homology of the 2013 survey with the 2002 CAF survey and general population surveys in 2002 and 2012 will provide an unusual opportunity to use the CFMHS to situate mental health in the CAF in a historical and societal perspective.

Indexed as

CanadaHealth SurveysHumansMental HealthMental Health ServicesMilitary PersonnelOccupational DiseasesCanadaepidemiologymental disordersmilitary personneloccupational healthreviewsurvey researchuse of health services

Identifiers

PMID27270738
PMCPMC4800478
OpenAlexW2323682351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.