Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27270714›Full record

ArticleDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2016

ANItools web: a web tool for fast genome comparison within multiple bacterial strains.

Na Han, Yujun Qiang, Wen Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Draft genome ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Draft genome sequence ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Whole-genome sequence ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2023
    Article
  8. Identification of virulence factors and antibiotic resistance inMicrobiology resource announcements · 2023
    Article
  9. Draft genome sequences of twoMicrobiology resource announcements · 2023
    Article
  10. Draft Genome Sequence ofCurrent genomics · 2023
    Article
  11. Draft Genome Sequence ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Whole-Genome Sequence Data Analysis ofBioMed research international · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Na HanState Key Laboratory for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, National Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102206, China Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, Hangzhou 310003, China.
Yujun QiangState Key Laboratory for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, National Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102206, China Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, Hangzhou 310003, China.
Wen ZhangState Key Laboratory for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, National Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102206, China Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, Hangzhou 310003, China zhangwen@icdc.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly classification of prokaryotes was based solely on phenotypic similarities, but modern prokaryote characterization has been strongly influenced by advances in genetic methods. With the fast development of the sequencing technology, the ever increasing number of genomic sequences per species offers the possibility for developing distance determinations based on whole-genome information. The average nucleotide identity (ANI), calculated from pair-wise comparisons of all sequences shared between two given strains, has been proposed as the new metrics for bacterial species definition and classification.

resultsIn this study, we developed the web version of ANItools (http://ani.mypathogen.cn/), which helps users directly get ANI values from online sources. A database covering ANI values of any two strains in a genus was also included (2773 strains, 1487 species and 668 genera). Importantly, ANItools web can automatically run genome comparison between the input genomic sequence and data sequences (Genus and Species levels), and generate a graphical report for ANI calculation results.

conclusionANItools web is useful for defining the relationship between bacterial strains, further contributing to the classification and identification of bacterial species using genome data.Database URL: http://ani.mypathogen.cn/.

Indexed as

BacteriaSoftwareDNA, BacterialGenome, BacterialGenomicsInternetSequence AlignmentSequence Analysis, DNADNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID27270714
PMCPMC4911789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.