ArticleChinese medical journal2016
Accuracy Assessment of Three-dimensional Surface Reconstructions of In vivo Teeth from Cone-beam Computed Tomography.
Article in Chinese medical journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Accuracy of bone height and thickness measurements in cone beam computed tomography using different voxel sizes in maxilla and mandible.Caspian journal of internal medicine · 2026Article
- Effects of Three Types of Movements of Nickel-Titanium Instruments on Root Canal Preparation: Analysis by Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Influence of CBCT device, voxel size, and segmentation software on the accuracy of tooth volume measurements.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Does LeFort I Surgery Have Any Influence on External Root Resorption?Turkish journal of orthodontics · 2025Article
- Repeatability and effect of different voxel sizes on linear and volumetric tooth and pulp measurements using cone-beam computed tomography.BMC oral health · 2024Article
- Effect of mineralized dentin matrix on the prognosis of bone defect and retained root after coronectomy.Clinical oral investigations · 2024Article
- The chance and challenge of creating virtual patients in prosthodontics.Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2024Article
- Automatic tooth periodontal ligament segmentation of cone beam computed tomography based on instance segmentation network.Heliyon · 2024Article
- A Critical Review of the Efficacy and Safety of Radiological Imaging Techniques in Pediatric Orthodontics.Galen medical journal · 2024Review
- Effects of the cone-beam computed tomography protocol on the accuracy and image quality of root surface area measurements: AnImaging science in dentistry · 2023Article
- Quantitative analysis of zirconia and titanium implant artefacts in three-dimensional virtual models of multi-slice CT and cone beam CT: does scan protocol matter?Dento maxillo facial radiology · 2023Article
- Article
- Accuracy of three-dimensional periodontal ligament models generated using cone-beam computed tomography at different resolutions for the assessment of periodontal bone loss.Korean journal of orthodontics · 2023Article
- The Validity and Reliability of Automatic Tooth Segmentation Generated Using Artificial Intelligence.TheScientificWorldJournal · 2023Article
- Three-dimensional evaluation of maxillary sinus volume, skeletal and dentoalveolar maxillary anterior region, in unilateral palatally impacted maxillary canine (Cross-sectional study).Journal of orthodontic science · 2023Article
- Validation and comparison of volume measurements using 1 multidetector computed tomography and 5 cone-beam computed tomography protocols: An in vitro study.Imaging science in dentistry · 2022Article
- Three-dimensional quantification of the relationship between the upper first molar and maxillary sinus.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2022Article
- Volumetric Analysis of the Jaws in Skeletal Class I and III Patients with Different Facial Divergence Using CBCT Imaging.Radiology research and practice · 2022Article
- Automated tooth segmentation as an innovative tool to assess 3D-tooth movement and root resorption in rodents.Head & face medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe accuracy of three-dimensional (3D) reconstructions from cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) has been particularly important in dentistry, which will affect the effectiveness of diagnosis, treatment plan, and outcome in clinical practice. The aims of this study were to assess the linear, volumetric, and geometric accuracy of 3D reconstructions from CBCT and to investigate the influence of voxel size and CBCT system on the reconstructions results.
methodsFifty teeth from 18 orthodontic patients were assigned to three groups as NewTom VG 0.15 mm group (NewTom VG; voxel size: 0.15 mm; n = 17), NewTom VG 0.30 mm group (NewTom VG; voxel size: 0.30 mm; n = 16), and VATECH DCTPRO 0.30 mm group (VATECH DCTPRO; voxel size: 0.30 mm; n = 17). The 3D reconstruction models of the teeth were segmented from CBCT data manually using Mimics 18.0 (Materialise Dental, Leuven, Belgium), and the extracted teeth were scanned by 3Shape optical scanner (3Shape A/S, Denmark). Linear and volumetric deviations were separately assessed by comparing the length and volume of the 3D reconstruction model with physical measurement by paired t- test. Geometric deviations were assessed by the root mean square value of the imposed 3D reconstruction and optical models by one-sample t-test. To assess the influence of voxel size and CBCT system on 3D reconstruction, analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used (μ = 0.05).
resultsThe linear, volumetric, and geometric deviations were -0.03 ± 0.48 mm, -5.4 ± 2.8%, and 0.117 ± 0.018 mm for NewTom VG 0.15 mm group; -0.45 ± 0.42 mm, -4.5 ± 3.4%, and 0.116 ± 0.014 mm for NewTom VG 0.30 mm group; and -0.93 ± 0.40 mm, -4.8 ± 5.1%, and 0.194 ± 0.117 mm for VATECH DCTPRO 0.30 mm group, respectively. There were statistically significant differences between groups in terms of linear measurement (P < 0.001), but no significant difference in terms of volumetric measurement (P = 0.774). No statistically significant difference were found on geometric measurement between NewTom VG 0.15 mm and NewTom VG 0.30 mm groups (P = 0.999) while a significant difference was found between VATECH DCTPRO 0.30 mm and NewTom VG 0.30 mm groups (P = 0.006).
conclusionsThe 3D reconstruction from CBCT data can achieve a high linear, volumetric, and geometric accuracy. Increasing voxel resolution from 0.30 to 0.15 mm does not result in increased accuracy of 3D tooth reconstruction while different systems can affect the accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.