Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27270542›Full record

ArticleChinese medical journal2016

Role of Liquid-based Cytology and Cell Block in the Diagnosis of Endometrial Lesions.

Hui Zhang, Jia Wen, Pi-Li Xu, Rui Chen, Xi Yang, Lian-Er Zhou, Ping Jiang, An-Xia Wan, Qin-Ping Liao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chinese medical journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Diagnostic Efficacy of Cell Block and Liquid-Based Cytology for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration in Pancreatic Tumors.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hui ZhangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, China.
Jia WenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tsinghua Chang Gung Hospital, Beijing 102218, China.
Pi-Li XuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, China.
Rui ChenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tsinghua Chang Gung Hospital, Beijing 102218, China.
Xi YangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tsinghua Chang Gung Hospital, Beijing 102218, China.
Lian-Er ZhouDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, China.
Ping JiangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, China.
An-Xia WanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, China.
Qin-Ping LiaoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, China.
Capital Medical University · CNBeijing Tsinghua Chang Gung Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLiquid-based cytology (LBC) offers an alternative method to biopsy in screening endometrial cancer. Cell block (CB), prepared by collecting residual cytological specimen, represents a novel method to supplement the diagnosis of endometrial cytology. This study aimed to compare the specimen adequacy and diagnostic accuracy of LBC and CB in the diagnosis of endometrial lesions.

methodsA total of 198 women with high risks of endometrial carcinoma (EC) from May 2014 to April 2015 were enrolled in this study. The cytological specimens were collected by the endometrial sampler (SAP-1) followed by histopathologic evaluation of dilatation and curettage or biopsy guided by hysteroscopy. The residual cytological specimens were processed into paraffin-embedded CB after LBC preparation. Diagnostic accuracies of LBC and CB for detecting endometrial lesions were correlated with histological diagnoses. Chi-square test was used to compare the specimen adequacies of LBC and CB.

resultsThe specimen inadequate rate of CB was significantly higher than that of LBC (22.2% versus 7.1%, P < 0.01). There were 144 cases with adequate specimens for LBC and CB preparation. Among them, 29 cases were atypical endometrial hyperplasia (11 cases) or carcinoma (18 cases) confirmed by histology evaluation. Taking atypical hyperplasia and carcinoma as positive, the diagnostic accuracy of CB was 95.1% while it was 93.8% in LBC. When combined LBC with CB, the diagnostic accuracy was improved to 95.8%, with a sensitivity of 89.7% and specificity of 97.4%.

conclusionsCB is a feasible and reproducible adjuvant method for screening endometrial lesions. A combination of CB and LBC can improve the diagnostic accuracy of endometrial lesions.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiopsyCross-Sectional StudiesCytodiagnosisEarly Detection of CancerEndometrial HyperplasiaEndometrial NeoplasmsEndometriumFemaleHumansMiddle AgedSensitivity and SpecificitySpecimen Handling

Identifiers

PMID27270542
PMCPMC4910370
OpenAlexW2418779680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.