Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27270455›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2016

Indirect Fitness Benefits Enable the Spread of Host Genes Promoting Costly Transfer of Beneficial Plasmids.

Tatiana Dimitriu, Dusan Misevic, Chantal Lotton, Sam P Brown, Ariel B Lindner, François Taddei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Increased copy number couples the evolution of plasmid horizontal transmission and plasmid-encoded antibiotic resistance.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Phylogenomic Analysis of Extraintestinal PathogenicAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2019
    Article
  16. Adaptation to public goods cheats inProceedings. Biological sciences · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tatiana DimitriuInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, U1001, Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Dusan MisevicInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, U1001, Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Chantal LottonInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, U1001, Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Sam P BrownGeorgia Institute of Technology, School of Biology, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Ariel B LindnerInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, U1001, Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.
François TaddeiInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, U1001, Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial genes that confer crucial phenotypes, such as antibiotic resistance, can spread horizontally by residing on mobile genetic elements (MGEs). Although many mobile genes provide strong benefits to their hosts, the fitness consequences of the process of transfer itself are less clear. In previous studies, transfer has been interpreted as a parasitic trait of the MGEs because of its costs to the host but also as a trait benefiting host populations through the sharing of a common gene pool. Here, we show that costly donation is an altruistic act when it spreads beneficial MGEs favoured when it increases the inclusive fitness of donor ability alleles. We show mathematically that donor ability can be selected when relatedness at the locus modulating transfer is sufficiently high between donor and recipients, ensuring high frequency of transfer between cells sharing donor alleles. We further experimentally demonstrate that either population structure or discrimination in transfer can increase relatedness to a level selecting for chromosomal transfer alleles. Both mechanisms are likely to occur in natural environments. The simple process of strong dilution can create sufficient population structure to select for donor ability. Another mechanism observed in natural isolates, discrimination in transfer, can emerge through coselection of transfer and discrimination alleles. Our work shows that horizontal gene transfer in bacteria can be promoted by bacterial hosts themselves and not only by MGEs. In the longer term, the success of cells bearing beneficial MGEs combined with biased transfer leads to an association between high donor ability, discrimination, and mobile beneficial genes. However, in conditions that do not select for altruism, host bacteria promoting transfer are outcompeted by hosts with lower transfer rate, an aspect that could be relevant in the fight against the spread of antibiotic resistance.

Indexed as

Gene Transfer, HorizontalAlgorithmsBacteriaConjugation, GeneticDrug Resistance, BacterialEscherichia coliEvolution, MolecularGenes, BacterialGenetic FitnessGenetics, PopulationInterspersed Repetitive SequencesModels, GeneticPlasmidsSelection, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID27270455
PMCPMC4896427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.