Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27270276›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2016

Revisiting the Concept of Targeting Only Bacillus anthracis Toxins as a Treatment for Anthrax.

Itai Glinert, Elad Bar-David, Assa Sittner, Shay Weiss, Josef Schlomovitz, Amir Ben-Shmuel, Adva Mechaly, Zeev Altboum, David Kobiler, Haim Levy

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Rapid and Sensitive Multiplex Assay for the Detection ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Using Telemetry Data to Refine Endpoints for New Zealand White Rabbits Challenged withJournal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2017
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Itai GlinertDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Israel Institute for Biological Research, Ness Ziona, Israel.
Elad Bar-DavidDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Israel Institute for Biological Research, Ness Ziona, Israel.
Assa SittnerDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Israel Institute for Biological Research, Ness Ziona, Israel.
Shay WeissDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Israel Institute for Biological Research, Ness Ziona, Israel.
Josef SchlomovitzDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Israel Institute for Biological Research, Ness Ziona, Israel.
Amir Ben-ShmuelDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Israel Institute for Biological Research, Ness Ziona, Israel.
Adva MechalyDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Israel Institute for Biological Research, Ness Ziona, Israel.
Zeev AltboumDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Israel Institute for Biological Research, Ness Ziona, Israel.
David KobilerDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Israel Institute for Biological Research, Ness Ziona, Israel.
Haim LevyDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Israel Institute for Biological Research, Ness Ziona, Israel haiml@iibr.gov.il.
Israel Institute for Biological Research · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protective antigen (PA)-based vaccines are effective in preventing the development of fatal anthrax disease both in humans and in relevant animal models. The Bacillus anthracis toxins lethal toxin (lethal factor [LF] plus PA) and edema toxin (edema factor [EF] plus PA) are essential for the establishment of the infection, as inactivation of these toxins results in attenuation of the pathogen. Since the toxins reach high toxemia levels at the bacteremic stages of the disease, the CDC's recommendations include combining antibiotic treatment with antitoxin (anti-PA) immunotherapy. We demonstrate here that while treatment with a highly potent neutralizing monoclonal antibody was highly efficient as postexposure prophylaxis treatment, it failed to protect rabbits with any detectable bacteremia (≥10 CFU/ml). In addition, we show that while PA vaccination was effective against a subcutaneous spore challenge, it failed to protect rabbits against systemic challenges (intravenous injection of vegetative bacteria) with the wild-type Vollum strain or a toxin-deficient mutant. To test the possibility that additional proteins, which are secreted by the bacteria under pathogenicity-stimulating conditions in vitro, may contribute to the vaccine's potency, we immunized rabbits with a secreted protein fraction from a toxin-null mutant. The antiserum raised against the secreted fraction reacts with the bacteria in an immunofluorescence assay. Immunization with the secreted protein fraction did not protect the rabbits against a systemic challenge with the fully pathogenic bacteria. Full protection was obtained only by a combined vaccination with PA and the secreted protein fraction. Therefore, these results indicate that an effective antiserum treatment in advanced stages of anthrax must include toxin-neutralizing antibodies in combination with antibodies against bacterial cell targets.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnthraxAnthrax VaccinesAntibodies, BacterialAntigens, BacterialAntitoxinsBacillus anthracisBacterial ToxinsFemaleImmune SeraRabbitsSpores, BacterialVaccinationanthrax toxinAnthrax VaccinesAntibodies, BacterialAntigens, BacterialAntitoxinsBacterial ToxinsImmune Sera

Identifiers

PMID27270276
PMCPMC4958181
OpenAlexW2414533991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.