Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27269735›Full record

ReviewMatrix biology : journal of the International Society for Matrix Biology2017

Engineered matrices for skeletal muscle satellite cell engraftment and function.

Woojin M Han, Young C Jang, Andrés J García

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Matrix biology : journal of the International Society for Matrix Biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Is the myonuclear domain ceiling hypothesis dead?Singapore medical journal · 2023
    Review
  6. The Role of Extracellular Matrix in Human Neurodegenerative Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Injectable biomimetic liquid crystalline scaffolds enhance muscle stem cell transplantation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Woojin M HanWoodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States; Petit Institute for Bioengineering and Bioscience, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Young C JangPetit Institute for Bioengineering and Bioscience, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States; School of Applied Physiology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Andrés J GarcíaWoodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States; Petit Institute for Bioengineering and Bioscience, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States. Electronic address: andres.garcia@me.gatech.edu.

Funding

Hydrogels for hMSC delivery & engraftmentR01AR062368 · NIAMS · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI GARCIA, ANDRES J · 2012 to 2022
$3.5M
Osseo-reparative, integrin-specific materialsR01AR062920 · NIAMS · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI GARCIA, ANDRES J · 2012 to 2021
$3.2M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR062368NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR062920
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regeneration of traumatically injured skeletal muscles is severely limited. Moreover, the regenerative capacity of skeletal muscle declines with aging, further exacerbating the problem. Recent evidence supports that delivery of muscle satellite cells to the injured muscles enhances muscle regeneration and reverses features of aging, including reduction in muscle mass and regenerative capacity. However, direct delivery of satellite cells presents a challenge at a translational level due to inflammation and donor cell death, motivating the need to develop engineered matrices for muscle satellite cell delivery. This review will highlight important aspects of satellite cell and their niche biology in the context of muscle regeneration, and examine recent progresses in the development of engineered cell delivery matrices designed for skeletal muscle regeneration. Understanding the interactions of muscle satellite cells and their niche in both native and engineered systems is crucial to developing muscle pathology-specific cell- and biomaterial-based therapies.

Indexed as

AlginatesAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsCell- and Tissue-Based TherapyCells, ImmobilizedCollagenGene ExpressionGlucuronic AcidHexuronic AcidsHumansHydrogelsMuscle, SkeletalMuscular DiseasesMyoD ProteinPAX7 Transcription FactorRegenerationAlginatesBiocompatible MaterialsCollagenGlucuronic AcidHexuronic AcidsHydrogelsMyoD1 myogenic differentiation proteinMyoD ProteinPAX7 protein, humanPAX7 Transcription FactorAgingBiomaterialExtracellular matrixNicheSatellite cellsSkeletal muscleStem cell therapy

Identifiers

PMID27269735
PMCPMC5136521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.