Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27269597›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2016

Effects of cortical damage on binocular depth perception.

Holly Bridge

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Minimal theory of 3D vision: new approach to visual scale and visual shape.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. V1 as an egocentric cognitive map.Neuroscience of consciousness · 2021
    Article
  11. Ophthalmic Biomarkers for Alzheimer's Disease: A Review.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Microstructural properties of the vertical occipital fasciculus explain the variability in human stereoacuity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Vision in our three-dimensional world.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Holly BridgeFMRIB Centre, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK holly.bridge@ndcn.ox.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-8089-6198

Funding

Medical Research Council G0400132Medical Research Council MR/K014382/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stereoscopic depth perception requires considerable neural computation, including the initial correspondence of the two retinal images, comparison across the local regions of the visual field and integration with other cues to depth. The most common cause for loss of stereoscopic vision is amblyopia, in which one eye has failed to form an adequate input to the visual cortex, usually due to strabismus (deviating eye) or anisometropia. However, the significant cortical processing required to produce the percept of depth means that, even when the retinal input is intact from both eyes, brain damage or dysfunction can interfere with stereoscopic vision. In this review, I examine the evidence for impairment of binocular vision and depth perception that can result from insults to the brain, including both discrete damage, temporal lobectomy and more systemic diseases such as posterior cortical atrophy.This article is part of the themed issue 'Vision in our three-dimensional world'.

Indexed as

AgnosiaAlzheimer DiseaseAnimalsDepth PerceptionHemianopsiaHumansMacacaPerceptual DisordersVision, BinocularVisual Cortexbinocular visioncortical damagehemianopiastereopsisvisual system

Identifiers

PMID27269597
PMCPMC4901448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.