Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27269285›Full record

ArticleeLife2016

Peripheral optogenetic stimulation induces whisker movement and sensory perception in head-fixed mice.

Sunmee Park, Akhil Bandi, Christian R Lee, David J Margolis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Fabrication of a Multilayer Implantable Cortical Microelectrode Probe to Improve Recording Potential.Journal of microelectromechanical systems : a joint IEEE and ASME publication on microstructures, microactuators, microsensors, and microsystems · 2021
    Article
  6. Optogenetic activation of muscle contractionConnective tissue research · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Optogenetic Control of the Peripheral Nervous System.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2019
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sunmee ParkDepartment of Cell Biology and Neuroscience, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, United States.
Akhil BandiDepartment of Cell Biology and Neuroscience, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, United States.
Christian R LeeDepartment of Cell Biology and Neuroscience, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, United States.
David J MargolisDepartment of Cell Biology and Neuroscience, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2678-4216

Funding

Neural circuit mechanisms underlying cognitive control of sensory-guided behaviorR01NS094450 · NINDS · RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIV OF N.J. · PI David J Margolis · 2016 to 2026
$3.6M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS094450
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We discovered that optical stimulation of the mystacial pad in Emx1-Cre;Ai27D transgenic mice induces whisker movements due to activation of ChR2 expressed in muscles controlling retraction and protraction. Using high-speed videography in anesthetized mice, we characterize the amplitude of whisker protractions evoked by varying the intensity, duration, and frequency of optogenetic stimulation. Recordings from primary somatosensory cortex (S1) in anesthetized mice indicated that optogenetic whisker pad stimulation evokes robust yet longer latency responses than mechanical whisker stimulation. In head-fixed mice trained to report optogenetic whisker pad stimulation, psychometric curves showed similar dependence on stimulus duration as evoked whisker movements and S1 activity. Furthermore, optogenetic stimulation of S1 in expert mice was sufficient to substitute for peripheral stimulation. We conclude that whisker protractions evoked by optogenetic activation of whisker pad muscles results in cortical activity and sensory perception, consistent with the coding of evoked whisker movements by reafferent sensory input.

Indexed as

MovementPerceptionAnimalsElectroencephalographyMice, TransgenicOptogeneticsSomatosensory CortexVibrissaeactive sensationbarrel cortexchannelrhodopsin-2mousemystacial vibrissaeneurosciencesensorimotor integrationtactile learning

Identifiers

PMID27269285
PMCPMC4940159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.